Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using randomized controlled trials to evaluate socially complex services: problems, challenges and recommendations.

Nancy Wolff1

  • 1Institute for Health, Health Care and Aging Research, Rutgers University, 30 College Avenue, New Brunswick, NH 08901-1293, USA.

The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics
|April 23, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensory processing assessment in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Opportunities for improved care.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports·2025
Same author

Validation and measurement invariance of the childhood trauma questionnaire short form among incarcerated men and women in Spain.

Child abuse & neglect·2023
Same author

Reducing the Methodological Heterogeneity ("Noise") in the Literature Predicting In-Prison Interpersonal Harm in Male Populations.

Trauma, violence & abuse·2023
Same author

The Prevalence of Prison-based Physical and Sexual Victimization in Males and Females: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Trauma, violence & abuse·2022
Same author

Patterns of Childhood Adversities and Their Associations With Adult Victimization Among Incarcerated Men and Women in Spanish Prisons.

International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology·2022
Same author

Violence Against Incarcerated Women: Predicting Risk Through the Lens of Childhood Harm.

Violence against women·2021
Same journal

Geographic Access to Mental Health Facilities for People with Disabilities.

The journal of mental health policy and economics·2026
Same journal

Early Impacts of a Medicaid Value-Based Payment Policy on Quality of Care in a Large Population with Serious Mental Illness.

The journal of mental health policy and economics·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Medicaid Expansion on Mental Health for White, Black, and Hispanic Americans: Estimates for 2014-2022.

The journal of mental health policy and economics·2026
Same journal

The Cost-Utility of a Workplace Mental Health Program for Employees with Common Mental Disorders (FRIAA Project).

The journal of mental health policy and economics·2026
Same journal

PERSPECTIVE: Community Health Centers: The Missed Opportunity to Widely Integrate Mental and Primary Health Care in France.

The journal of mental health policy and economics·2026
Same journal

Unveiling the Value of Early Depression Screening in U.S. Adults: A Systematic Review of Clinical Benefits and Economic Returns.

The journal of mental health policy and economics·2026
See all related articles

The randomized controlled trial (RCT) model is not suitable for evaluating complex social services (SCS) due to their inherent variability. Adapting RCT designs is crucial for effective research in mental health and social policy.

Area of Science:

  • Public Policy
  • Mental Health Services Research
  • Social Services Evaluation

Background:

  • Effectiveness research, guided by evidence-based medicine, is the standard for public policy.
  • Mental health, social services, and criminal justice systems increasingly require such evaluations.
  • Socially Complex Services (SCS) present unique challenges due to their nature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To question the applicability of the simple randomized controlled trial (RCT) paradigm for evaluating Socially Complex Services (SCS).
  • To explore the difficulties in applying RCTs to interventions with non-standardized staff, ambiguous protocols, and diverse participants.
  • To examine the implications of lacking standardization and equivalence in real-world service evaluations.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examining limitations of effectiveness research by comparing RCT assumptions with SCS characteristics.
  • Utilizing examples from programs for mentally disordered offenders in Britain.
  • Analyzing the violation of RCT assumptions by SCS interventions.

    • Main Results:

    • Socially Complex Services (SCS) violate the core assumptions of the simple randomized controlled trial (RCT) model.
    • This violation raises significant doubts about the validity, reliability, and generalizability of SCS trial inferences.
    • Standard RCTs are insufficient for capturing the nuances of complex service delivery.

    Conclusions:

    • The RCT is not a universal solution for evaluating all types of interventions.
    • Effectiveness research for SCS requires more complex RCT designs sensitive to bias and contextual factors.
    • Major design innovations are needed for RCT-based research to inform mental health policy effectively.