Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On counting and counting errors.

R W Guillery1

  • 1Department of Anatomy, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, WI 53706, USA. r.guiller@facstaff.wisc.edu

The Journal of Comparative Neurology
|April 23, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Otto Friedrich Karl Deiters (1834-1863).

The Journal of comparative neurology·2013
Same author

Distinct functions for direct and transthalamic corticocortical connections.

Journal of neurophysiology·2011
Same author

Branched thalamic afferents: what are the messages that they relay to the cortex?

Brain research reviews·2010
Same author

An editor's checklist.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2008
Same author

Relating the neuron doctrine to the cell theory. Should contemporary knowledge change our view of the neuron doctrine?

Brain research reviews·2007
Same author

Anatomical pathways that link perception and action.

Progress in brain research·2005

Accurate histological counting is crucial but often flawed. This review emphasizes the need for detailed methods reporting to improve the reliability of object counts in research.

Area of Science:

  • Histology
  • Neuroscience
  • Quantitative Biology

Background:

  • Object counting in histological sections is a common yet challenging research task.
  • Misconceptions and errors in counting methods are prevalent in scientific literature.
  • Recent methods require precise measurements perpendicular to section planes, posing difficulties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of adequate methodological information for histological counts.
  • To address common errors and misconceptions in quantitative histology.
  • To guide researchers and reviewers on best practices for histological counting.

Main Methods:

  • Review of literature on histological counting methods.
  • Analysis of common errors and challenges in quantitative histology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of recently introduced counting techniques and their measurement requirements.

    • Main Results:

    • Many histological counts contain errors or lack sufficient methodological detail for accuracy assessment.
    • There is a need for standardized reporting of counting procedures.
    • Newer counting methods introduce specific challenges related to perpendicular measurements.

    Conclusions:

    • Adequate reporting of counting methods is essential for scientific rigor in histology.
    • Researchers must be aware of potential errors and complexities in quantitative histological analysis.
    • Improved methodological transparency will enhance the reliability of histological data.