Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Avoiding misperceptions: classifying rehabilitation projects using letters rather than numbers.

Huib Cornielje1, Peter G Nicholls, Johan P Velema

  • 1Hogeschool Leiden, Department of Public Health, Leiden, Netherlands.

Leprosy Review
|April 24, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Methotrexate and prednisolone study in erythema nodosum leprosum (MaPs in ENL) protocol: a double-blind randomised clinical trial.

BMJ open·2020
Same author

A leprosy clinical severity scale for erythema nodosum leprosum: An international, multicentre validation study of the ENLIST ENL Severity Scale.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2017
Same author

Corticosteroids for treating nerve damage in leprosy.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2016
Same author

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ciclosporin to Prednisolone in the Treatment of Erythema Nodosum Leprosum: Two Randomised, Double Blind, Controlled Pilot Studies in Ethiopia.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2016
Same author

ENLIST 1: An International Multi-centre Cross-sectional Study of the Clinical Features of Erythema Nodosum Leprosum.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2015
Same author

Outcomes after unplanned admission to hospital in older people: ill-defined conditions as potential indicators of the frailty trajectory.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2012

A new letter-based classification system for rehabilitation projects is proposed, moving beyond quantitative scores. This system helps analyze projects, define policy, and evaluate rehabilitation interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation science
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Previous rehabilitation project classification systems used quantitative scoring.
  • Quantitative scoring systems may imply a hierarchy of project value (better, more correct, or more important).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an alternative, non-hierarchical classification system for rehabilitation projects.
  • To develop a classification system based on key project dimensions rather than scores.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a classification system using letters derived from four dimensions.
  • The four dimensions include: desired outcome, client participation, target group, and services offered.
  • Presented examples to illustrate the application of the new classification system.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The proposed letter-based classification system characterizes specific types of rehabilitation projects.
  • This system offers a neutral way to categorize diverse rehabilitation approaches.

Conclusions:

  • The new classification system provides a framework for analyzing rehabilitation projects.
  • It serves as a tool for policy definition and a foundation for project evaluation.
  • This approach avoids the potential bias associated with quantitative scoring in rehabilitation research.