Taxonomic variation in the patterns of craniofacial dimorphism in primates

Understanding sexual dimorphism in living primates is important for interpreting the biological and taxonomic significance of variation in the primate fossil record. In the past two decades, there has been an increasing emphasis on the fact that sexual dimorphism varies in both magnitude and pattern among species. Several studies have suggested that distinct patterns of dimorphism may assist in species recognition and perhaps phylogenetic analysis. This study evaluates patterns of craniofacial dimorphism in samples of 82 anthropoid primates. Dimensions of the viscerocranium tend to be more dimorphic than those of the neurocranium and orbits. Principal components analysis of phylogenetically controlled data demonstrates a basic pattern of dimorphism in overall skull proportions, and a distinction between length and breadth measurements. For any given species there can be substantial variation in the magnitude of dimorphism among dimensions, and different species can show substantially different patterns of dimorphism within and between regions of the skull and jaws. Patterns of dimorphism are clearly associated with phylogeny. Pattern similarity is not dependent on the overall magnitude of craniofacial dimorphism, or body mass dimorphism. Among all anthropoids, there are few combinations of characters that consistently show greater or lesser degrees of dimorphism. Such "stability" of patterns increases within genera. Patterns of dimorphism are likely to be useful for interpreting the taxonomic significance of variation in the fossil record. However, phylogenetic propinquity alone is not reason to use an extant species as a model for variation in an extinct species. Rather, care must be taken to identify stable patterns of dimorphism within a group of closely related extant species.