Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
A scoring system for bruise patterns: a tool for identifying abuse
F D Dunstan1, Z E Guildea, K Kontos
1Department of Child Health, University of Wales College of Medicine, Academic Centre, Llandough Hospital, Penarth, Wales CF64 2XX, UK.
Insights
A new scoring system effectively differentiates between abused and non-abused children based on bruising patterns. This tool aids in the diagnosis of child abuse by analyzing bruise extent and shape, particularly on the head and neck.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Forensic Medicine
- Child Abuse Detection
Background:
- Bruising patterns in children can be indicative of physical abuse.
- Objective measures are needed to support the diagnosis of child abuse.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differences in bruising extent and patterns between abused and non-abused children.
- To develop a scoring system to aid in the diagnosis of child abuse.
Main Methods:
- Measured total bruising length across 12 body areas in 133 abused and 189 control children (aged 1-14 years).
- Developed a logistic regression model using bruising lengths in five body regions and bruise shape.
- Assessed the discriminatory power of the scoring system.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in total bruising length were observed between abused and control groups.
- Bruising differences were most pronounced on the head and neck compared to limbs.
- The developed scoring system, incorporating bruise shape, showed good discrimination between abused and non-abused children.
Conclusions:
- A bruise scoring system can effectively discriminate between abused and non-abused children.
- This system offers a valuable aid in the diagnosis of child abuse, complementing clinical assessment.
- Further development is recommended to refine this diagnostic tool.
Aims:
To determine whether abused and non-abused children differ in the extent and pattern of bruising, and whether any differences which exist are sufficiently great to develop a score to assist in the diagnosis of abuse.
Methods:
Total length of bruising in 12 areas of the body was determined in 133 physically abused and 189 control children aged 1-14 years.
Results:
Our method of recording bruises by site, maximum dimension, and shape was easy to use. There were clear differences between cases and controls in the total length of bruises. These differences were at their greatest in the head and neck and were less notable in the limbs. A scoring system was developed using logistic regression analysis using total lengths of bruising in five regions of the body. Good discrimination between the two sets of children was achieved using this score; by including a variable that indicates whether a bruise had a recognisable shape the discrimination could be made even better. Given a prior probability of abuse the score can be used to give posterior odds of abuse, given a particular bruising pattern.
Conclusions:
The scoring system provides a measure that discriminates between abused and non-abused children, which should be straightforward to implement, though the results must be interpreted carefully. We do not see this score as replacing the complex qualitative analysis of the diagnosis of abuse. This clearly includes history as well as examination, but rather as the beginning of the development of an important aid in this process.
