Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression.

S K Gardiner1, D P Crabb

  • 1Faculty of Science and Mathematics, The Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.

The British Journal of Ophthalmology
|April 26, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychological, social and everyday visual impact of diabetic macular oedema and diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2019
Same author

Objective quantification of vitreous haze on optical coherence tomography scans: no evidence for relationship between uveitis and inflammation in multiple sclerosis.

European journal of neurology·2019
Same author

Optimizing OCT acquisition parameters for assessments of vitreous haze for application in uveitis.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

Are rates of vision loss in patients in English glaucoma clinics slowing down over time? Trends from a decade of data.

Eye (London, England)·2015
Same author

A view on glaucoma--are we seeing it clearly?

Eye (London, England)·2015
Same author

Are rates of vision loss in patients in English glaucoma clinics slowing down over time? Trends from a decade of data.

Eye (London, England)·2015
Same journal

Identifying patients with poor visual outcomes after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery using machine learning.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Incidence of bilateral disease and choroidal neovascularisation in punctate inner choroiditis.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Reference map of multimodal vision deficits in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: contrast sensitivity and low-contrast visual acuity.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Commentary on 'identifying patients with poor visual outcomes after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery using machine learning'.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Automated deep learning-based retinoschisis and detachment volume measurement in pathological myopia with posterior scleral contraction.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Bacterial keratitis: a global review of current practices, challenges and innovations.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Increasing visual field testing frequency improves detection of progression but reduces accuracy. Three tests annually offer a balance between sensitivity and specificity for pointwise linear regression analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Visual field testing is crucial for monitoring eye conditions like glaucoma.
  • Pointwise linear regression (PLR) is a common method for determining visual field progression.
  • The optimal frequency of visual field testing for accurate progression detection remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate how different testing frequencies impact the accuracy of visual field progression detection using PLR.
  • To determine the sensitivity and specificity of PLR at various testing intervals.

Main Methods:

  • A "virtual eye" model was created to simulate visual field sensitivity data over time.
  • Simulated data incorporated varying rates of deterioration and noise to mimic real-world scenarios.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Diagnoses of progression were compared against the known "true" status of the virtual eye at different testing frequencies.

    • Main Results:

    • Higher testing frequencies led to quicker detection of simulated progression (2 dB/year deterioration).
    • Increased testing frequency also raised the rate of false positives (incorrectly identified progression) in stable virtual eyes within the first three years.
    • Sensitivity of PLR increased with testing frequency, while specificity decreased.

    Conclusions:

    • Higher frequency of visual field testing enhances the sensitivity of PLR for detecting progression.
    • Conversely, increased testing frequency reduces the specificity of PLR, potentially leading to unnecessary treatment changes.
    • Conducting three visual field tests per year appears to offer an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity.