Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Set-size effects for spatial frequency change and discrimination in multiple targets.

Michael J Wright1, Louise Alston, Ariella V Popple

  • 1Department of Human Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK. michael.wright@brunel.ac.uk

Spatial Vision
|May 7, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Visual search performance depends on whether stimuli can be globally analyzed. When stimuli can be averaged, signal detection limits performance; otherwise, attention and memory limitations cause steeper set-size effects.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors associated with radiological misstaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective observational study.

Current problems in diagnostic radiology·2024
Same author

Bacterial second messenger cyclic di-AMP in streptococci.

Molecular microbiology·2023
Same author

Accuracy of pharmacy student self-assessment of a single sterile compounding technique following didactic training.

Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning·2023
Same author

Oncologic resection of pancreatic cancer with isolated liver metastasis: Favorable outcomes in select patients.

Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences·2023
Same author

Evaluating Age as a Predictor of Postoperative Opioid Use and Prescribing Habits in Older Adults With Cancer.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2022
Same author

Accurate Nodal Staging in Pancreatic Cancer in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy.

World journal of surgery·2022

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Visual search set-size effects show detection thresholds rising with stimulus count.
  • Previous research suggests low-level explanations for change blindness, particularly with spatial frequency changes.
  • Understanding the interplay between stimulus detection and attention is crucial for explaining these effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate the roles of stimulus detection versus attention in visual search.
  • To analyze how stimulus and task variables influence the set-size effect in change detection.
  • To investigate the mechanisms underlying performance limitations in visual search tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized visual search tasks with varying numbers of Gabor targets (1-4) presented in two frames with a 250 ms inter-stimulus interval (ISI).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) detection task with uniform distracters.
  • Conducted 2AFC spatial frequency (SF) discrimination tasks with both homogeneous and inhomogeneous distracters, manipulating whether distracters also changed across the ISI.

    • Main Results:

    • Detection tasks with uniform distracters yielded set-size slopes between 0.23-0.52, consistent with standard visual search.
    • SF discrimination tasks showed steeper slopes (0.68-0.96) with distracters, suggesting stimulus averaging within frames.
    • When distracters changed across ISI, preventing averaging and requiring focal attention, set-size slopes consistently exceeded 1.

    Conclusions:

    • Global analysis of stimulus arrays relies on signal detection mechanisms, not limited attention or memory.
    • When global analysis is hindered (e.g., multiple changing items), attention and memory limitations become dominant, leading to more pronounced set-size effects.
    • The findings distinguish between low-level sensory limitations and higher-level cognitive control in visual change detection.