Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Societal opinions regarding CPR.

Catherine A Marco1, Raquel M Schears

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43608-2691, USA. cmarco2@aol.com

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
|May 7, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Perspectives on Cannabis Use Between Emergency Department Patients Who Are Users and Non-users.

The western journal of emergency medicine·2025
Same author

Part 3: Ethics: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Circulation·2025
Same author

Characteristics of trauma patients involved in motor vehicle collisions before and after legalization of medical marijuana in Pennsylvania.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2025
Same author

High Blood Pressure Among Emergency Department Patients: Effects of Educational Intervention.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Antipsychotic agents for treatment of schizophrenia in the emergency department: Comparison of oral and parenteral first- and second-generation agents.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2025
Same author

Association of ICD-10 Z code-documented social determinants of health with emergency department outcomes in ectopic pregnancy.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2025
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of emergency department triage systems for predicting clinical severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of five-level triage scales.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Methanol toxicity from inhalational abuse of a methyl acetate-containing nail polish remover.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Regarding strategies, feasibility of implementations and results of HIV screening in emergency departments.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Rocuronium dosing for rapid sequence intubation: A retrospective analysis in ED and ICU settings.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Clinical features of adults with undiagnosed acute leukemia in the emergency department: A descriptive study.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Occult intraperitoneal gynecological hemorrhage: An under-evaluated source of hemoperitoneum after blunt trauma.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
See all related articles

Most people prefer to refuse resuscitation for elderly or debilitated patients, despite inaccurate survival rate perceptions. Public opinion on resuscitation preferences can inform end-of-life care decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health
  • Emergency Medicine

Background:

  • Resuscitative measures are standard for cardiac arrest patients unless an advance directive states otherwise.
  • This default presumption of patient wishes for resuscitation lacks empirical evidence.
  • Societal understanding of patient preferences for resuscitation is crucial for end-of-life care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine general public preferences regarding resuscitation in various clinical scenarios.
  • To assess public perceptions of survival rates after cardiac arrest.
  • To explore discussions about end-of-life care between patients and physicians.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 724 volunteers at community events over 16 months.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants responded to 6 validated hypothetical clinical scenarios indicating personal resuscitation preferences.
  • Data analysis included Fisher's exact test and scalogram analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • A strong preference for resuscitation was shown for young, healthy patients (96%).
    • Few desired resuscitation for elderly, debilitated patients (27%), with a trend towards refusal (98%) in such cases.
    • Respondents overestimated survival rates post-cardiac arrest (mean 50%) and rarely discussed resuscitation with physicians (10%).

    Conclusions:

    • Public opinion trends toward refusing resuscitation in scenarios with poor prognoses.
    • Physician awareness of these public opinions is valuable for end-of-life decision-making, especially for patients without advance directives.
    • Findings support establishing societal consensus on resuscitation preferences to inform policy development.