Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic decision-making in anatomic pathology.

E Foucar1

  • 1Department of Pathology, Presbyterian Hospital, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|May 8, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Error in anatomic pathology.

American journal of clinical pathology·2002
Same author

Classification in anatomic pathology.

American journal of clinical pathology·2002
Same author

Error: an obstacle in the journey from quackery to quality.

Pathologica·2001
Same author

Predictive genetics and predictive morphology have certain similarities.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2001
Same author

'Individuality' in the specialty of surgical pathology: self-expression or just another source of diagnostic error?

The American journal of surgical pathology·2000
Same author

Patient and tumor characteristics of colon cancers with microsatellite instability: a population-based study.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2000
Same journal

Invasive urothelial carcinoma in association with surface low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma: clinical and pathologic insights from a rare entity.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

CEACAM1 expression by immunohistochemistry in B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell myeloma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive multicriteria life cycle assessment of biopsy processing in a surgical pathology department.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic significance of Myb protein and its downstream target genes in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Mismatch repair protein "nonclassic expression loss" pattern in colorectal cancer: an important staining pattern that is not well understood.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain in medical laboratory personnel: a cross-sectional study.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
See all related articles

Diagnostic pathology relies on decision-making, but errors occur due to poorly understood cognitive processes. Rule-based problem-solving offers a potential avenue for improvement and study in this field.

Area of Science:

  • Pathology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Medical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Diagnostic pathology involves matching case facts to diagnostic categories, ideally with high certainty.
  • Diagnostic errors and uncertainty can arise from various factors, often linked to decision-making failures.
  • Key aspects of diagnostic decision-making, such as pattern recognition and implicit knowledge, remain poorly understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review intriguing aspects of decision-making in diagnostic pathology.
  • To stimulate interest among pathologists regarding the study and improvement of diagnostic decision-making.
  • To explore the potential of rule-based problem-solving as a tractable area for research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on cognitive processes in diagnostic pathology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of decision-making failures and their underlying causes.
  • Focus on rule-based problem-solving as a contrast to less understood cognitive elements.

    • Main Results:

    • Many diagnostic problems stem from failures in decision-making processes.
    • Certain cognitive components like "instant pattern recognition" are difficult to study or improve.
    • Rule-based problem-solving is a more understood and potentially improvable aspect of diagnostic reasoning.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding diagnostic decision-making is crucial for reducing errors in pathology.
    • Further research into rule-based problem-solving may offer practical strategies for enhancing diagnostic accuracy.
    • Stimulating interest in cognitive aspects of pathology is essential for advancing the field.