Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Error in anatomic pathology.

E Foucar1

  • 1Department of Pathology, Presbyterian Hospital, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|May 8, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Anatomic pathology errors are shifting from individual failures to a systemic issue for the entire specialty. Addressing these requires clear standards and a focus on learning from mistakes to improve patient safety.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic decision-making in anatomic pathology.

American journal of clinical pathology·2002
Same author

Classification in anatomic pathology.

American journal of clinical pathology·2002
Same author

Error: an obstacle in the journey from quackery to quality.

Pathologica·2001
Same author

Predictive genetics and predictive morphology have certain similarities.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2001
Same author

'Individuality' in the specialty of surgical pathology: self-expression or just another source of diagnostic error?

The American journal of surgical pathology·2000
Same author

Patient and tumor characteristics of colon cancers with microsatellite instability: a population-based study.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2000
Same journal

Invasive urothelial carcinoma in association with surface low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma: clinical and pathologic insights from a rare entity.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

CEACAM1 expression by immunohistochemistry in B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell myeloma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive multicriteria life cycle assessment of biopsy processing in a surgical pathology department.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic significance of Myb protein and its downstream target genes in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Mismatch repair protein "nonclassic expression loss" pattern in colorectal cancer: an important staining pattern that is not well understood.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain in medical laboratory personnel: a cross-sectional study.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Pathology
  • Medical Error Analysis
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Anatomic pathology error is transitioning from an individual pathologist issue to a broader, systemic concern within the specialty.
  • Distinguishing true errors from diagnostic uncertainty and practice variations is a significant challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the evolving landscape of anatomic pathology errors.
  • To identify challenges in error detection and response.
  • To discuss the impact of the legal system on error management and patient safety.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of error in anatomic pathology.
  • Review of challenges in diagnostic accuracy and practice variation.
  • Discussion of the role of gold standards and hindsight bias.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of the impact of the legal system on error reporting and improvement.

    • Main Results:

    • Error identification necessitates scientifically valid diagnostic standards.
    • Areas lacking gold standards are prone to hindsight bias and subjective judgment.
    • The legal system often hinders learning from errors, focusing on punishment rather than improvement.
    • Pathologists have limited recourse after significant errors, impacting both patient and provider.

    Conclusions:

    • The transition of error management in anatomic pathology requires robust systems for identification and learning.
    • Establishing evidence-based best practices and valid gold standards is crucial.
    • Reforming the legal and systemic response to errors is essential to foster a culture of safety and continuous improvement in healthcare.