Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of catheter-securing devices.

C Tracy1

  • 1Urology Department and Nursing Services, Auckland Hospital, Healthcare Services Limited, New Zealand.

Urologic Nursing
|May 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Next-generation precision medicine for suicidality prevention.

Translational psychiatry·2024
Same author

Integration of nanowire devices in out-of-plane geometry.

Nano letters·2010
Same author

SEM characterization of silicon nanostructures: can we meet the challenge?

Scanning·2008
Same author

Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalised adults.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2004
Same author

Improved patient outcomes at a urology nurse clinic.

Urologic nursing·1999
Same author

Orthodontics in Germany. Recent changes to the remunerative system.

British journal of orthodontics·1995

Securing urinary catheters is crucial in urologic nursing. This study found that traditional methods, like adhesive tape and pins, can be more effective and cost-efficient for patients than commercial devices.

Area of Science:

  • Urologic Nursing
  • Medical Device Research

Background:

  • Catheter care is a significant aspect of urologic nursing.
  • Methods for securing urinary catheters are under-researched.
  • Current practices often depend on anecdotal evidence and manufacturer claims.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of different urinary catheter securing devices.
  • To compare traditional methods with commercially available options.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on catheter securing techniques.
  • Comparative analysis of commercial devices versus traditional tape and pin methods.
  • Assessment of factors like ease of application, wear-time, patient comfort, infection prevention, and cost.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Commercial devices are often marketed with claims of superiority.
  • The study identified instances where traditional methods were found to be more suitable.
  • Cost-effectiveness and accessibility of traditional methods were highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • The best method for securing urinary catheters may not always be the newest commercial device.
  • Traditional methods like adhesive tape and pins can remain a viable and effective option.
  • Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for catheter securement.