Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differing perspectives on mental health evaluation.

G Spivack, C H St Clair, J Siegel

    The American Journal of Psychiatry
    |December 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The effect of coronal plane angulation on patient reported outcome measures of operatively treated distal femur fractures: A multi-center prospective evaluation.

    Injury·2024
    Same author

    A randomized phase IIa study of quantified bone scan response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223 dichloride alone or in combination with abiraterone acetate/prednisone or enzalutamide.

    ESMO open·2021
    Same author

    Development or worsening of sarcoidosis associated with IL-17 blockade for psoriasis.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
    Same author

    Interleukin-17 blockade downregulates NOD2 in skin and may promote paradoxical sarcoidosis.

    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
    Same author

    Tailoring metal-dielectric nanocomposite materials with ultrashort laser pulses for dichroic color control.

    Nanoscale·2019
    Same author

    Surface characterization and antibacterial response of silver nanowire arrays supported on laser-treated polyethylene naphthalate.

    Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications·2016
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: President-Elect Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: CEO and Medical Director's Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Reports to the Membership.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Convergent Metabolic Dysregulations But Divergent Contributing Pathways Across Severe Mental Disorders: The Power of Combining Genetics and Metabolomics.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: Presidential Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Represcribing Previously Used Antipsychotics: Response to So.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    See all related articles

    Community mental health center evaluation priorities differ by stakeholder. Consumers prioritized accountability, while staff focused on efficiency and effectiveness, highlighting diverse needs in mental health services research.

    Area of Science:

    • Community mental health services research
    • Program evaluation methodologies
    • Stakeholder analysis in healthcare

    Background:

    • Community mental health centers (CMHCs) require effective evaluation to ensure service quality and accountability.
    • Diverse stakeholders, including center professionals, citizens, and funders, have varying perspectives on CMHC operations and success metrics.
    • Establishing consensus on evaluation priorities is crucial for guiding resource allocation and program improvement in mental health settings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify and compare the evaluation priorities of different stakeholder groups involved with community mental health centers.
    • To understand the influence of diverse interests (e.g., consumer, management, funding) on the perceived importance of various evaluation aspects.
    • To explore the implications of these differing perspectives for establishing effective evaluation frameworks within CMHCs.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    • Conducted small-group workshops with participants representing various stakeholder roles (center professionals, concerned citizens, funders).
    • Facilitated discussions focused on identifying and prioritizing key evaluation aspects for community mental health centers.
    • Analyzed participant feedback to discern differing interests and their impact on evaluation priorities.

    Main Results:

    • A majority of participants emphasized accountability from a consumer perspective.
    • Center staff prioritized efficiency and effectiveness in evaluations.
    • External stakeholders showed greater concern for community involvement, while center management issues, cost, and equity received lower value.
    • Seven distinct role perspectives influencing evaluation priorities were identified.

    Conclusions:

    • Stakeholder perspectives significantly shape the perceived importance of evaluation priorities in community mental health centers.
    • Reconciling diverse interests, such as consumer accountability versus operational efficiency, is essential for developing comprehensive evaluation strategies.
    • Understanding these role perspectives is critical for successfully implementing and sustaining meaningful program evaluations in mental health settings.