Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Effects of left ventricular systolic dysfunction on left atrial appendage and left atrial functions in patients with
Mustafa Cemri1, Timur Timurkaynak, Murat Ozdemir
1Gazi University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Ankara, Turkey. mcemri@hotmail.com
Insights
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction significantly impairs left atrial and left atrial appendage function in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. This dysfunction also increases the risk of thrombus formation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Atrial Fibrillation Research
Background:
- Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is suspected to negatively impact left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) functions.
- Understanding these effects is crucial for managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare LA and LAA functional parameters in patients with chronic nonvalvular AF, stratified by the presence or absence of LV systolic dysfunction.
Main Methods:
- Echocardiography was used to assess LV ejection fraction (EF) and various LA/LAA parameters in 28 patients with chronic nonvalvular AF.
- Patients were divided into two groups: those with LV systolic dysfunction (Group I) and those with normal LV systolic function (Group II).
Main Results:
- Group I (LV dysfunction) exhibited significantly larger LA diameter, lower LAA ejection velocity and fraction, and reduced pulmonary venous (PV) systolic velocity and PV systolic/diastolic velocity ratio compared to Group II.
- While decreased LAA filling and PV diastolic velocities were observed in Group I, the difference was not statistically significant.
- Thrombus and/or spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) were significantly more frequent in Group I (75%) than in Group II (18%).
Conclusions:
- LV systolic dysfunction demonstrably impairs multiple LA and LAA function parameters.
- LV systolic dysfunction is associated with a higher incidence of SEC and/or LA thrombus in patients with chronic nonvalvular AF.
Objective:
It has been claimed that left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction impairs left atrial (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) functions. In this study, we compared the LA and LAA function parameters in patients with chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with and without LV systolic dysfunction.
Methods And Results:
The study population consisted of 28 patients with chronic nonvalvularAF. Group I consisted of 12 patients with LV systolic dysfunction (mean age: 61 +/- 14 years; LV ejection fraction: 44 +/- 6%), group II of 16 patients with normal LV systolic function (mean age: 52 +/- 15 years; LV ejection fraction: 65 +/- 3%). LV ejection fraction (EF) was measured by echocardiography utilizing bi-plane area length method. The following LA and LAA transoesophageal echocardiography parameters were obtained: I) LA diameter, 2) LAA ejection velocity, 3) LAA filling velocity, 4) LAA ejection fraction, 5) pulmonary venous (PV) systolic velocity, 6) PV diastolic velocity, 7) PV systolic velocity/diastolic velocity ratio. The left atrium diameter was significantly larger in group I than in group 11 (4.7 +/- 0.7 cm vs. 3.8 +/- 0.6 cm, p < 0.05). The LAA ejection velocity and LAA ejection fraction were significantly lower in group I than in group 11 (22.6 +/- 15.5 cm/s vs 37.5 +/- 11.3 cm/s and 26.9 +/- 20.8% vs. 41.3 +/- 10.9%, p < 0.05 for both comparisons). The PV systolic velocity and PV systolic velocity/diastolic velocity ratio were significantly smaller in group I than in group II (26.2 +/- 14.8 cm/s vs. 51.5 +/- 22 cm/s and 0.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.5, p < 0.05 for both comparisons). Although decreased LAA filling and PV diastolic velocities were determined in group I, no significant difference existed between groups I and II. Thrombus and/or spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the LA and/or LAA were more frequent in group I (75% vs. 18%, p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
These results indicate that LV systolic dysfunction impairs various LA and LA function parameters and is associated with an increased frequency of SEC and/or LA thrombus in patients with chronic nonvalvularAF.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
