Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modulation detection interference in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Sid P Bacon1, Jane M Opie

  • 1Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-1908, USA. spb@asu.edu

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR
|May 11, 2002
PubMed
Summary

This study found that mild hearing loss does not impact the ability to detect amplitude modulation (AM) when signals are presented with competing modulated sounds. Results suggest cochlear hearing loss does not hinder AM processing in one frequency band amidst interference from another.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CI decision making and expectations by older adults.

Cochlear implants international·2021
Same author

Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired.

Trends in hearing·2019
Same author

Shifting Fundamental Frequency in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Listening: Effects of F0 Variation.

Ear and hearing·2015
Same author

Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2012
Same author

On the mechanisms involved in the recovery of envelope information from temporal fine structure.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2011
Same author

Shifting fundamental frequency in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2010

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Amplitude modulation (AM) detection is crucial for speech intelligibility.
  • Understanding how hearing loss affects AM processing in complex auditory environments is important.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of mild hearing loss on amplitude modulation (AM) detection.
  • To examine AM detection in the presence of a competing modulated masker carrier.

Main Methods:

  • Listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss detected AM of a target carrier (10 Hz) with an unmodulated or modulated masker carrier (2, 10, or 40 Hz).
  • Carrier frequencies were 984 Hz and 3952 Hz, with signal and masker roles reversed.
  • Hearing impaired ears had a 30-40 dB loss at 4 kHz; normal ears were tested at equal sensation levels.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant individual variability was observed in listener performance.
  • No clear detrimental effect of mild hearing loss on AM detection was found.
  • Performance was similar across normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Conclusions:

  • Mild, presumably cochlear, hearing loss does not appear to impair the ability to process AM in one frequency region when competing AM is present in another.
  • These findings suggest that the auditory system can effectively segregate and process AM signals even with mild hearing impairment.