Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating on-line continuing education for nurses.

A Huckstadt1, K Hayes

  • 1Wichita State University, School of Nursing, 1845 Fairmount, Wichita, KS 67260-0041, USA.

Nursing Leadership Forum
|May 15, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A public health approach to modern slavery in the United Kingdom: a codeveloped framework.

Public health·2024
Same author

Standardization of radiograph readings during bowel management week.

Pediatric surgery international·2023
Same author

Short-interval fires increasing in the Alaskan boreal forest as fire self-regulation decays across forest types.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Early rehabilitation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has minimal impact on physiological parameters: A pilot randomised controlled trial.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses·2020
Same author

Ultrasound features of immature ovarian teratomas: Case series and review of literature.

Ultrasound (Leeds, England)·2020
Same author

A critical review of definitions used to describe Pseudomonas aeruginosa microbiological status in patients with cystic fibrosis for application in clinical trials.

Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society·2019
Same journal

Benefits and costs of integrating technology into undergraduate nursing programs.

Nursing leadership forum·2005
Same journal

The dedicated education unit: a practice and education partnership.

Nursing leadership forum·2005
Same journal

Managing resources and ensuring accountability: understanding return on investment.

Nursing leadership forum·2005
Same journal

A model to identify direct costs of nursing education: the Colorado experience.

Nursing leadership forum·2005
Same journal

Contribution margin modeling by academic unit: an evidence-based approach to programmatic decision making.

Nursing leadership forum·2005
Same journal

A budget model to determine the financial health of nursing education programs in academic institutions.

Nursing leadership forum·2005
See all related articles

Evaluating online nursing continuing education requires critical appraisal due to author anonymity. This study offers criteria and a rating tool to assess web site quality and usability for learners.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Education
  • Health Informatics
  • Digital Learning

Background:

  • The proliferation of online nursing continuing education websites necessitates rigorous evaluation.
  • Anonymity of web authors and sponsors can compromise accountability in digital learning environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish criteria for evaluating online nursing continuing education websites.
  • To introduce a rating instrument for assessing the quality and usability of these resources.
  • To guide learners in selecting reliable online continuing education offerings.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a rating instrument based on critical appraisal criteria.
  • Application of the rating instrument to review two selected nursing continuing education websites.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of a curated list of reputable nursing continuing education websites.

    • Main Results:

    • The study provides a framework for critical appraisal of online nursing continuing education.
    • The rating instrument aids in determining the quality and usability of digital educational resources.
    • Two websites were reviewed using the developed instrument, demonstrating its practical application.

    Conclusions:

    • A systematic approach to evaluating online nursing continuing education is crucial for ensuring quality and accountability.
    • The proposed rating instrument empowers learners to make informed decisions about their professional development.
    • Accessible and reliable online resources are vital for the ongoing education of nursing professionals.