Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The mental health paradox.

Michael Petrasek, Lynn Rapin

    Benefits Quarterly
    |May 15, 2002
    PubMed
    Summary

    Mental health coverage is cost-effective, improving patient well-being and reducing employee absenteeism. Employers can take steps to counteract declining mental health service valuations.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same journal

    How ACA Is Forcing a Technology Revolution.

    Benefits quarterly·2018
    Same journal

    How Employers Are Looking at Specialty Pharmacy Today.

    Benefits quarterly·2018
    Same journal

    Pharmacy Benefit Integration: A Connected Approach to Total Medical Cost Savings.

    Benefits quarterly·2018
    Same journal

    Attention Turns to Specialty Pharmacy.

    Benefits quarterly·2018
    Same journal

    Managing Pharmacy Trend Rates.

    Benefits quarterly·2018
    Same journal

    Challenges Facing U.S. Long-Term Care Financing: Future Needs, Key Issues and Current Solutions.

    Benefits quarterly·2018

    Area of Science:

    • Health Economics
    • Mental Health Services Research
    • Occupational Health

    Background:

    • Evidence suggests mental health coverage offers significant benefits, including cost savings and improved patient outcomes.
    • Declining valuations of mental health services pose a challenge for accessibility and quality of care.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness and patient benefits of mental health coverage.
    • To identify factors contributing to the decline in mental health service valuations.
    • To provide employers with strategies to mitigate these declines.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of existing studies on mental health coverage.
    • Analysis of factors influencing mental health service valuations.
    • Synthesis of employer-focused strategies for mental health service provision.

    Main Results:

    • Mental health coverage reduces overall healthcare costs and improves patient satisfaction and functioning.
    • Employee absenteeism decreases with adequate mental health support.
    • Factors contributing to declining valuations are identified, offering insights for intervention.

    Conclusions:

    • Investing in mental health coverage is financially prudent and beneficial for employee well-being.
    • Employers can play a crucial role in sustaining and improving mental health services by addressing valuation challenges.

    Related Experiment Videos