Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Value-related effects on psychiatric judgment.

J M Schwartz, S I Abramowitz

    Archives of General Psychiatry
    |December 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, screening, and assessment of hepatic reserve.

    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2020
    Same author

    A screening questionnaire for occupational and hobby exposures during pregnancy.

    Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2019
    Same author

    Commentary: real-world triple therapy experience treating hepatitis C virus - authors' reply.

    Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2014
    Same author

    Transition or transformation? Personal and political development of former Berkeley Free Speech Movement activists.

    Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
    Same author

    Keeping the faith: Psychosocial correlates of activism persistence into middle adulthood.

    Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
    Same author

    Effect of fibrosis on adverse events in patients with hepatitis C treated with telaprevir.

    Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2013
    Same journal

    Reviewers Who Completed a Review During 2011.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2017
    Same journal

    Conflicts of interest-reply.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    Epidemiologic evidence concerning the bereavement exclusion in major depression-reply.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    This month in archives of general psychiatry.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    About this journal.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    Same journal

    This month in archives of general psychiatry.

    Archives of general psychiatry·2013
    See all related articles

    Psychiatrist political bias can influence clinical judgments, but this study found no evidence that bias disproportionately harms marginalized groups. Further research is needed to understand subtle biases in psychiatric assessments.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Social Psychology
    • Medical Ethics

    Background:

    • Political bias is a potential confounding factor in psychiatric diagnosis.
    • Understanding psychiatrist bias is crucial for equitable patient care.
    • Previous research has suggested bias may affect clinical impressions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the influence of political bias on psychiatric diagnostic impressions.
    • To examine whether psychiatrist bias systematically disadvantages specific demographic groups.
    • To assess the relationship between moral traditionalism and clinical judgment.

    Main Methods:

    • 102 psychiatrists were randomly selected from a national register.
    • Participants made six clinical decisions based on varied case histories (sex, race).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Psychiatrists also completed a moral traditionalism scale.
  • Main Results:

    • Covert psychiatrist bias in forming clinical impressions was evident.
    • The study did not substantiate claims of inevitable bias against disenfranchised groups.
    • Moral traditionalism scores did not consistently predict biased decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • Psychiatrist bias is a relevant factor in psychiatric impressions.
    • The extent and direction of bias require further investigation.
    • Current findings do not support the hypothesis of systematic disadvantage for marginalized populations due to psychiatrist bias.