Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing oncological productivity. is one method sufficient?

D Ugolini1, C Casilli, G S Mela

  • 1CilNews Group,Universita' di, Genoa, Italy. ugolini@hp380.ist.unige.it

European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
|May 15, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Constraints on Cosmic Strings Using Data from the Third Advanced LIGO-Virgo Observing Run.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA.

Living reviews in relativity·2020
Same author

GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150  M_{⊙}.

Physical review letters·2020
Same author

Characterization of transient noise in Advanced LIGO relevant to gravitational wave signal GW150914.

Classical and quantum gravity·2020
Same author

GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO.

Physical review. D. (2016)·2020
Same author

Search for Subsolar Mass Ultracompact Binaries in Advanced LIGO's Second Observing Run.

Physical review letters·2019
Same journal

Early-onset colorectal cancer across Europe: Burden, mechanisms, and health-system implications.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same journal

Clinical urgency of incidental findings in the first year of the 4-IN-THE-LUNG-RUN lung cancer screening program.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same journal

Clinically relevant endpoints and quality-of-life outcomes with darolutamide in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: Analyses of the phase III ARASENS trial.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same journal

Mapping the anatomical landscape of colorectal tumours: Location-specific efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies: Pooled analysis of randomised trials.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same journal

Left behind but not left alone: Excluded cell populations in the non-small cell lung cancer stroma predict superior long-term overall survival.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same journal

Survival outcomes of adjuvant therapy in resected stage III melanoma: Results from a real-life cohort study (TAMARIS).

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
See all related articles

Comparing research productivity methods for European Union oncology papers reveals that while publication counts remain stable, mean Impact Factors vary significantly by methodology. This highlights the impact of research evaluation approaches.

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Oncology Research
  • Scientometrics

Background:

  • Analyzes 1995 European Union (EU) oncological publications across all Science Citation Index (SCI) subject categories.
  • Compares publication data based on all contributing authors' countries of origin with a prior study using corresponding authors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare two distinct methodologies for evaluating research productivity.
  • To assess the influence of adopted methodology on research output evaluation results.

Main Methods:

  • Collected data on published papers per country, per capita, per GDP, and mean Impact Factors (IF).
  • Analyzed journal distribution and SCI categories for EU authors' publications.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Publication numbers, population ratios, and GDP rankings showed little change (UK, Germany, France led in papers; Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands led in population/GDP ratios).
  • Mean IF results differed substantially between methodologies for certain countries (Germany, Belgium, Portugal, France performed well; Norway, Sweden, Austria, Spain showed poorer results).
  • Oncological papers were published across diverse SCI categories beyond oncology, including biochemistry and pathology.

Conclusions:

  • Methodology significantly impacts scientometric interpretations of research productivity.
  • Careful consideration of evaluation methods is crucial for accurate analysis of scientific output.
  • Research productivity in oncology extends beyond specialized oncology journals.