Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing uncertainty in DNA evidence caused by sampling effects.

J M Curran1, J S Buckleton, C M Triggs

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|May 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Estimating sampling error in forensic DNA testimony is crucial. While various methods exist, the highest posterior density approach is preferred for its performance, though others are adequate for specific scenarios.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global diversity analysis of plant-associated <i>Pseudopithomyces</i> fungi reveals a new species producing the toxin associated with facial eczema in livestock: <i>Pseudopithomyces toxicarius sp. nov</i>.

Studies in mycology·2026
Same author

A ruler detection method for auto-adjusting scales of shoeprint images.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2024
Same author

Shoeprint image retrieval and crime scene shoeprint image linking by using convolutional neural network and normalized cross correlation.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2023
Same author

<i>Fusarium</i>: more than a node or a foot-shaped basal cell.

Studies in mycology·2021
Same author

Bayesian mixture modelling for glass refractive index measurement.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2021
Same author

Phylogenetic relationships of eight new <i>Dacrymycetes</i> collected from New Zealand.

Persoonia·2017

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Statistics
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of sampling error in forensic DNA analysis is essential for reliable testimony.
  • Modern forensic DNA methods present challenges in error estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the necessity and methodology of sampling error estimation in forensic DNA testimony.
  • To evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of different sampling error estimation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of statistical approaches including normal approximation, bootstrap, and highest posterior density (HPD).
  • Analysis of method performance based on factors like database size, complexity of DNA stains (single vs. multiple contributors), and computational resources.
  • Consideration of alternative approaches such as size-bias correction and factor of 10.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All modern methods exhibit both strengths and weaknesses, with the optimal choice being subjective.
  • The highest posterior density approach is preferred for overall performance.
  • Normal approximation, bootstrap, and HPD methods are suitable for single-contributor stains.
  • Complex stains may necessitate HPD or bootstrap methods due to intricate variance expressions.

Conclusions:

  • The selection of a sampling error estimation method depends on the specific forensic application and available resources.
  • While HPD is favored, other methods like bootstrap, normal approximation, size-bias correction, and factor of 10 can be acceptable if their limitations are understood.