Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Behavioral contrast redux.

Ben A Williams1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109, USA. bawilliams@ucsd.edu

Animal Learning & Behavior
|May 23, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules when time to reinforcement is held constant.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2013
Same author

Serial discrimination reversal learning in pigeons as a function of signal properties during the delay of reinforcement.

Learning & behavior·2013
Same author

Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2010
Same author

Perils of evidence-based medicine.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2010
Same author

Serial discrimination reversal learning in pigeons as a function of intertrial interval and delay of reinforcement.

Learning & behavior·2010
Same author

Active spatial perception in the vibrissa scanning sensorimotor system.

PLoS biology·2007
Same journal

Data archiving for animal cognition research: report of an NIMH workshop.

Animal learning & behavior·2003
Same journal

Behavioral expression of learned fear in rats is appropriate to their age at training, not their age at testing.

Animal learning & behavior·2003
Same journal

Representation of time in time-place learning.

Animal learning & behavior·2003
Same journal

Superlatent inhibition and spontaneous recovery: differential effects of pre- and postconditioning CS-alone presentations after long delays in different contexts.

Animal learning & behavior·2003
Same journal

No evidence for overshadowing or facilitation of spatial pattern learning by visual cues.

Animal learning & behavior·2003
Same journal

Postinjection suppression of drinking is modified by the presence of conditioned contextual cues: implications for both anticipatory and posttreatment nausea in humans.

Animal learning & behavior·2003
See all related articles

Behavioral contrast effects are complex, with new findings suggesting anticipatory contrast is influenced by Pavlovian conditioning. This challenges previous views on how reinforcement context affects stimulus value and response rates.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Psychology
  • Animal Behavior
  • Learning Theory

Background:

  • Behavioral contrast describes changes in response rates based on reinforcement schedules.
  • Contrast effects have local and molar components, with molar contrast often driven by anticipatory contrast.
  • Previous research suggested an inverse relationship between response rate and stimulus preference in anticipatory contrast.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between anticipatory contrast, stimulus preference, and Pavlovian contingencies.
  • To re-evaluate the role of reinforcement context in modulating stimulus value.
  • To clarify the underlying mechanisms of behavioral contrast.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental manipulation of Pavlovian contingencies within anticipatory contrast procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurement of response rates and stimulus preference under varying reinforcement conditions.
  • Analysis of the interplay between local and molar contrast components.

    • Main Results:

    • The inverse relationship between response rate and preference in anticipatory contrast is mediated by embedded Pavlovian contingencies.
    • Weakening these contingencies leads to a positive correlation between anticipatory contrast and stimulus preference.
    • This supports the view that reinforcement context inversely affects the value of a constant schedule.

    Conclusions:

    • Pavlovian contingencies play a crucial role in shaping anticipatory contrast and stimulus preference.
    • Reinforcement context significantly influences the perceived value of reinforcement schedules.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate how reinforcement context controls value, with parallels to conditioning principles.