Increased tumorigenicity, but unchanged immunogenicity, of transporter for antigen presentation 1-deficient tumors

Zhihai Qin1, Christina Harders, Xuetao Cao

  • 1Institute of Immunology, Universitaetsklinikum Benjamin Franklin, Haus IA, Hindenburgdamm 30, Free University of Berlin, 12200 Berlin, Germany. zhihai@ukbf.fu-berlin.de

Cancer Research
|May 23, 2002
PubMed

Insights

Tumor cells lacking transporter for antigen presentation 1 (TAP1) expression showed increased tumor growth. However, TAP1 expression on tumor cells enhanced rejection in immunized mice, suggesting a role in immune evasion.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Cancer Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Transporter for antigen presentation 1 (TAP1) is crucial for presenting tumor antigens to MHC class I molecules.
  • Lack of TAP1 expression on tumor cells can impact T-cell-dependent anti-tumor immunity.
  • Tumorigenicity and immune evasion are critical aspects of cancer progression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of TAP1 expression in tumor cell immunogenicity and rejection.
  • To determine the effect of TAP1 deficiency on tumor growth and T-cell responses.
  • To elucidate the mechanisms by which tumor cells may evade immune surveillance.

Main Methods:

  • Establishment of TAP1-expressing (TAP1(+)) and TAP1-deficient (TAP1(-)) tumor cell lines using ras-transformed NIH3T3 fibroblasts.
  • Assessment of tumor growth and tumorigenicity in immunocompetent and T-cell-deficient mice.
  • Evaluation of tumor rejection in previously immunized mice challenged with TAP1(+) or TAP1(-) tumor cells.
  • Analysis of CD8(+) T cell infiltration and IFN-gamma production in mixed tumor/lymphocyte cultures.

Main Results:

  • Impaired TAP1 expression increased tumor cell tumorigenicity in immunocompetent mice.
  • TAP1 expression was not essential for generating tumor immunity but enhanced rejection of established tumors.
  • CD8(+) T cells were required for the rejection of both TAP1(+) and TAP1(-) tumors.
  • TAP1 expression on tumor cells significantly increased IFN-gamma production by antigen-specific T cells from immunized mice.

Conclusions:

  • The lack of TAP1 expression does not alter the fundamental immunogenicity of tumor cells.
  • Tumor cells with impaired TAP1 expression may escape T-cell recognition during the effector phase of the immune response.
  • Targeting TAP1 pathways could be a strategy to enhance anti-tumor immunity and overcome immune evasion.

Related Concept Videos

Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes01:05

Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes

Genes usually encode proteins necessary for the proper functioning of a healthy cell. Mutations can often cause changes to the gene expression pattern, thereby altering the phenotype.
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Abnormal Proliferation02:23

Abnormal Proliferation

Under normal conditions, most adult cells remain in a non-proliferative state unless stimulated by internal or external factors to replace lost cells. Abnormal cell proliferation is a condition in which the cell's growth exceeds and is uncoordinated with normal cells. In such situations, cell division persists in the same excessive manner even after cessation of the stimuli, leading to persistent tumors. The tumor arises from the damaged cells that replicate to pass the damage to the daughter...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...