Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Better decisions through science: exercise testing scores.

Victor Froelicher1, Katerina Shetler, Euan Ashley

  • 1Cardiology Division, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. vicmd@aol.com

Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
|May 25, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design and rationale of the my heart counts cardiovascular health study: a large-scale, fully digital biobank, and randomized trial of large language model-driven coaching of physical activity.

American journal of preventive cardiology·2026
Same author

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Cardiac Function Estimation from Phone Videos of Echocardiograms.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Women's health initiative strong and healthy silent atrial fibrillation recording study: Rationale, study design, and baseline data.

American heart journal·2026
Same author

A comparison of DCD heart transplantation in Europe and the United States: A multi-center, retrospective study.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2026
Same author

RBM20 Truncating Variants and Human Cardiomyopathy.

JAMA cardiology·2026
Same author

Assessing the feasibility of using smartphone data to identify risk of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

NPJ cardiovascular health·2026
Same journal

Beyond therapeutic maximalism: Prioritization and personalization in preventive therapies.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same journal

Multimodality imaging of vulnerable plaque: Are we there yet? A multifaceted perspective.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same journal

Beyond LDL-C: Triangulating residual risk via lipoprotein(a), remnant cholesterol, and vascular inflammation.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same journal

COVID-19 and coronary atherosclerosis: Unmasking and accelerating?

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same journal

Mavacamten and left ventricular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with left bundle branch block.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
Same journal

Lessons from ATTR-CM clinical trials: Progress, persistent disparities, and emerging treatment dilemmas.

Progress in cardiovascular diseases·2026
See all related articles

Statistical scores improve coronary artery disease diagnosis and prognosis assessment for general practitioners. These scores, when presented simply, are as effective as expert cardiologists, guiding better patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Statistics
  • Clinical Decision Support

Background:

  • General practitioners and internists act as gatekeepers for cardiology referrals.
  • Optimal use of basic clinical tools (history, physical exam, exercise test) is crucial.
  • Existing diagnostic methods for coronary artery disease (CAD) can be enhanced.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of statistical scores in diagnosing CAD and assessing prognosis.
  • To compare the effectiveness of these scores against traditional methods and physician judgment.
  • To identify areas for improving prediction algorithms for CAD.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing multivariable statistical techniques with clinical and exercise data.
  • Comparing score-derived predictions with physician diagnosis and expert judgment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing the discriminating power of specific clinical and exercise test variables.

    • Main Results:

    • Scores derived from clinical and exercise data show superior discrimination compared to ST segment response alone.
    • Scores provide a more practical management strategy by stratifying disease probability and prognosis.
    • Scores are comparable to or better than physician judgment, especially for non-specialists.

    Conclusions:

    • Statistical scores, particularly when presented as nomograms or simple additive information, are readily accepted by physicians.
    • Further evaluation of variables like expired gases, ST/heart rate index, and heart rate recovery is needed.
    • Improving prediction algorithms, especially for women, is essential for accurate CAD assessment and cost-effective care.