Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Vantage point in episodic memory.

Heather K McIsaac¹, Eric Eich

¹Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. mcisaac@interchange.ubc.ca

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

|May 25, 2002

Summary

Recalling experiences from a field (first-person) viewpoint yields richer emotional and sensory details than an observer (third-person) viewpoint. This memory recall difference has potential forensic and clinical applications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Business not as usual.

Psychological science·2013

Same author

Principles and plans.

Psychological science·2012

Same author

Neural systems mediating field and observer memories.

Neuropsychologia·2009

Same author

Emotional valence and arousal interact in attentional control.

Psychological science·2008

Same author

Vantage point in traumatic memory.

Psychological science·2004

Same author

Memory for pain: relation between past and present pain intensity.

Pain·1985

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Human Memory Studies

Background:

Memory recall can be influenced by the perspective from which an experience is revisited.
Distinguishing between first-person (field) and third-person (observer) recall is crucial for understanding memory content.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the differences in memory content between field and observer recall perspectives.
To explore the potential implications of these memory distinctions.

Main Methods:

University undergraduates performed manual tasks and later recalled these experiences.
Recollections were elicited from either a field (own eyes) or observer (detached spectator) vantage point.

Main Results:

Field memories contained richer affective, sensory, and psychological details.
Observer memories provided more information on actions, appearance, and spatial context.
Significant differences were found in the content of field versus observer recollections.

Conclusions:

The vantage point significantly impacts the nature of recalled memories.
The field/observer memory distinction warrants further research for forensic and clinical applications.

Related Experiment Videos