Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Closed versus open suctioning techniques.

S M Maggiore1, E Iacobone, G Zito

  • 1Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy. smmaggiore@libero.it

Minerva Anestesiologica
|May 25, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Micro-SORS and machine learning for the non-invasive reference-free study of subsurface pigment degradation.

The Analyst·2026
Same author

Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome in children with type I - spinal muscular atrophy: a 12-year case series.

European journal of pediatrics·2025
Same author

Advanced paranasal sinuses osteomas: a retrospective multicentric analysis on surgical management outcomes and intra- and postsurgical complications.

Rhinology·2025
Same author

Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2024
Same author

Advanced portable micro-SORS prototype coupled with SERDS for heritage science.

The Analyst·2024
Same author

CARDIOCARE: An integrated platform for the management of elderly multimorbid patients with breast cancer therapy induced cardiac toxicity.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2023
Same journal

Rectus sheath block for analgesia in open abdominal surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Minerva anestesiologica·2026
Same journal

Highlights from the June 2026 issue.

Minerva anestesiologica·2026
Same journal

Validation of the Gendolcat model for chronic postsurgical pain after cesarean section: a multicenter study.

Minerva anestesiologica·2026
Same journal

Dual block strategy for complex incision in pediatric kidney transplantation: M-TAPA and quadroiliac plane block combination.

Minerva anestesiologica·2026
Same journal

Technical note: a novel fully visualized, glottic-sparing strategy for infant one-lung ventilation.

Minerva anestesiologica·2026
Same journal

Ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block facilitating early extubation following pediatric subxiphoid pericardial window surgery.

Minerva anestesiologica·2026
See all related articles

Closed suctioning systems offer advantages over open techniques by preventing contamination and lung volume loss during airway suctioning in hypoxemic patients. Further research is needed on ventilator-associated pneumonia and cost-effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Respiratory Therapy
  • Pulmonary Medicine

Background:

  • Traditional airway suctioning requires ventilator disconnection, risking contamination and lung derecruitment.
  • Closed suctioning systems maintain ventilator connection during airway clearance.
  • Severely hypoxemic patients may benefit from closed systems to preserve lung volume.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the advantages of closed suctioning systems versus open suctioning techniques.
  • To evaluate the impact of closed suctioning on patient contamination and lung mechanics.
  • To identify areas requiring further investigation regarding closed suctioning systems.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature comparing open and closed airway suctioning techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of physiological impacts, including lung volume and alveolar recruitment.
  • Discussion of contamination risks and potential benefits in specific patient populations.

    • Main Results:

    • Closed suctioning minimizes environmental, personnel, and patient contamination.
    • Closed systems help prevent loss of lung volume and alveolar derecruitment.
    • Potential benefits are most pronounced in severely hypoxemic patients.

    Conclusions:

    • Closed suctioning systems present significant advantages over open techniques, particularly in preserving lung mechanics.
    • Further studies are essential to evaluate the impact on ventilator-associated pneumonia and cost-effectiveness.
    • The influence of closed suctioning devices on overall ventilatory support requires additional assessment.