Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benchmarking and evidence-based practice: complementary approaches to achieving quality process improvement.

M L Vassallo1

  • 1Sid Peterson Memorial Hospital, Kerrville, TX, USA.

Seminars in Perioperative Nursing
|May 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Added value of spinal cord MRI in detecting active disease in non-relapsing progressive multiple sclerosis patients.

Journal of neurology·2025
Same journal

An overview of advanced practice nurses.

Seminars in perioperative nursing·2004
Same journal

Learning style theories: matching preceptors, learners, and teaching strategies in the perioperative setting.

Seminars in perioperative nursing·2004
Same journal

Bioterrorism: an overview.

Seminars in perioperative nursing·2004
Same journal

Evidence for opioid variability, Part 2: Psychosocial influences.

Seminars in perioperative nursing·2004
Same journal

Return to Bangka Island.

Seminars in perioperative nursing·2004
Same journal

Composition and performance of a small resuscitation team in a deployed military hospital.

Seminars in perioperative nursing·2004
See all related articles

Benchmarking and evidence-based practice are complementary strategies for operational improvement. Combining these approaches can enhance performance by leveraging their respective strengths and mitigating weaknesses.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Benchmarking and evidence-based practice are increasingly recognized in healthcare and other industries.
  • These quality improvement methodologies are often discussed but their synergistic potential requires further exploration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To delineate the distinct strengths and limitations of benchmarking and evidence-based practice.
  • To elucidate how these two processes can be integrated effectively within a cohesive improvement strategy.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of benchmarking principles.
  • Review of evidence-based practice frameworks.
  • Exploration of integration models for operational enhancement.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Benchmarking offers comparative insights and goal setting.
  • Evidence-based practice provides a foundation of validated interventions.
  • Concurrent application allows for data-driven goal setting and evidence-informed strategy implementation.

Conclusions:

  • Benchmarking and evidence-based practice are not interchangeable but highly complementary.
  • Integrated use optimizes operational performance by combining external validation with internal data.