Birth-weight-specific infant and neonatal mortality: effects of heterogeneity in the birth cohort

Timothy B Gage1

  • 1Department of Anthropology, University of Albany, NY 12222, USA.

Human Biology
|May 28, 2002
PubMed

Insights

Birth cohorts have subpopulations with differing infant mortality risks. A novel statistical method reveals this heterogeneity may explain stalled declines in infant mortality rates.

Area of Science:

  • Human biology
  • Biostatistics
  • Perinatal epidemiology

Background:

  • Infant mortality rates have shown recent decelerations in decline.
  • Ethnic disparities in birth-weight-specific infant mortality persist.
  • Existing models may not fully capture birth cohort heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate birth-weight-specific infant mortality using a novel statistical approach.
  • To identify subpopulations within birth cohorts based on mortality risk.
  • To explore the implications of identified heterogeneity for infant mortality trends and disparities.

Main Methods:

  • Application of parametric mixtures of logistic regressions.
  • Analysis of birth-weight-specific infant mortality data.
  • Development of a novel statistical procedure for population heterogeneity.

Main Results:

  • Birth cohorts comprise at least two subpopulations with distinct infant mortality profiles.
  • A "disturbed" subpopulation, despite higher overall mortality, exhibits lower birth-weight-specific mortality.
  • This phenomenon is hypothesized to result from selective fetal loss in the "disturbed" group.

Conclusions:

  • Identified birth cohort heterogeneity may explain decelerated declines in infant mortality.
  • This heterogeneity could underlie unexplained ethnic differences in infant mortality.
  • The developed statistical methodology has broad applications in human biology and mixture modeling.

Related Concept Videos

Nature and Nurture01:10

Nature and Nurture

Many human characteristics, like height, are shaped by both nature—in other words, by our genes—and by nurture, or our environment. For example, chronic stress during childhood inhibits the production of growth hormones and consequently reduces bone growth and height. Scientists estimate that 70-90% of variation in height is due to genetic differences among individuals, and 10-30% of variation in height is due to differences in the environments that individuals experience, such as differences...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Teratogenicity01:07

Teratogenicity

The ability of a drug to produce structural deformations and functional abnormalities in the developing embryo or the fetus is called teratogenicity, and the drug producing this effect is known as a teratogen. Teratogenic effects include stillbirth, miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, and neurocognitive delay. A teratogen may affect the embryo at different stages of development, which is important in determining the type and extent of the damage. During blastocyst formation, the early...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution01:17

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution

Drug distribution in the pediatric population exhibits unique challenges and considerations due to the physiological differences between children, particularly neonates and infants, and adults. A crucial aspect of pediatric pharmacology is understanding how these differences impact the pharmacokinetics of various drugs, necessitating age-specific dosing strategies to ensure efficacy and safety.Neonates and infants have a higher total body water content, ~75%–90% of their body weight, compared...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is: