Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2026

Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Published on: December 14, 2017
A "worst case" methodology for obtaining a rough but rapid indication of the societal risk from a major accident
1Methodology and Standards Development Unit, Hazardous Installations Directorate, Health & Safety Executive, St. Anne's House, Stanley Precinct, Bootle, L20 3RA, Merseyside, UK.
Abstract:
This paper describes a methodology developed to provide a rough but rapid indication of the magnitude of the societal risks at and in the vicinity of a major accident hazard installation. It is intended to be used by the UK Health & Safety Executive (HSE) as a first screening tool when examining safety reports submitted under The Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) Regulations 1999. These are the Regulations which implement in the UK the major aspects of Council Directive 96/82/EC, the "Seveso II" Directive. Within the methodology a new weighted risk integral parameter is defined, suitable for comparison with criteria, and its value calculated. The paper includes examples to illustrate the use of the methodology.
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Rate
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key aspect...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
The Availability Heuristic
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Design Example: Calculating Safe Diameter for Wind-Exposed Disc