Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using Monte Carlo methods to commission electron beams: a feasibility study.

John A Antolak1, Michael R Bieda, Kenneth R Hogstrom

  • 1Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030-4009, USA. jantolak@mdanderson.org

Medical Physics
|May 30, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real-time electron spectrometer utilizing a permanent magnet and diode detector array.

Medical physics·2025
Same author

Mini-lattice radiation therapy: A treatment planning approach to miniaturize spatially fractionated lattice radiation therapy using a clinical linear accelerator.

Medical physics·2025
Same author

Dosimetric validation of intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy planning and delivery using an anthropomorphic cylindrical head phantom.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2024
Same author

Factory quality assurance of passive radiotherapy intensity modulators for electrons using kilovoltage x-ray imaging.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2023
Same author

Modeling scatter through sides of island blocks used for intensity-modulated bolus electron conformal therapy.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2023
Same author

Automated testing platform for radiotherapy treatment planning scripts.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2022
Same journal

A computer-aided diagnosis tool in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence using 18F-PSMA PET/CT imaging.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Investigating the uncertainty of cellular microenvironment parameter estimations via diffusion MRI cytometry.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Monte Carlo simulations show promise for commissioning electron beams in medical linear accelerators, but accuracy challenges remain for clinical parameters.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Computational Dosimetry

Background:

  • Medical linear accelerators require precise commissioning for accurate radiation therapy.
  • Monte Carlo (MC) methods offer potential for detailed simulation of radiation beams.
  • Validating MC simulations against measured data is crucial for clinical adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility of using Monte Carlo methods for electron beam commissioning.
  • To compare MC-calculated dosimetry data with measured data from a medical linear accelerator.
  • To identify discrepancies and challenges in MC simulations for clinical electron beams.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the EGS4/BEAM code system to model a medical linear accelerator.
  • Simulated 6, 12, and 20-MeV electron beams.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculated key dosimetry parameters including percentage depth dose, profiles, and ratios.
  • Compared calculated data against measured commissioning data.

    • Main Results:

    • Calculated central axis data (depth dose, profiles, air-gap factors) were generally within 2% or 1 mm of measurements.
    • Discrepancies were observed for open-cone ratios and off-axis profiles in larger fields.
    • Agreement was impressive but did not fully meet the 2% (0.1 cm) accuracy hypothesis across all parameters.

    Conclusions:

    • Monte Carlo simulations show significant potential for electron beam commissioning but require further refinement.
    • Discrepancies may stem from code limitations, geometry inaccuracies, or source configuration approximations.
    • Further research is needed to overcome challenges and fully validate MC methods for clinical electron beam commissioning.