Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Training Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Ambulate Using a Powered Exoskeleton
Published on: June 16, 2016
Disability and quality of life in spina bifida and hydrocephalus
Ineke M Pit-ten Cate1, Colin Kennedy, Jim Stevenson
1Centre for Research into Psychological Development, Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, UK. ip@soton.ac.uk
Insights
Children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus experience significantly lower quality of life (CQOL). Family resources and condition severity are key factors influencing CQOL in these children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health
- Quality of Life Research
- Disability Studies
Background:
- Spina bifida and hydrocephalus are complex conditions affecting children's health and development.
- Understanding factors influencing quality of life (CQOL) is crucial for effective support.
- Previous research has explored various aspects of CQOL in pediatric populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of condition severity and type on CQOL in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus.
- To examine the role of family resources, including caregiving self-efficacy and family needs, in influencing CQOL.
- To identify specific aspects of CQOL that differ among children with spina bifida, hydrocephalus, and both conditions.
Main Methods:
- A national UK sample of children (aged 6-13) with spina bifida, hydrocephalus, or both was recruited via the Association for Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus (ASBAH) register.
- Parents completed standardized measures: Child Health Related Quality Of Life (CQOL), Family Needs Survey (FNS), and Caregiving Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES).
- Data were analyzed to assess relationships between condition characteristics, family resources, and overall/specific CQOL scores.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in overall CQOL were found among the three disability groups.
- Children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus had significantly lower overall CQOL compared to children with other physical conditions.
- Specific CQOL aspects varied: spina bifida impacted self-care, continence, and mobility; hydrocephalus affected school activities, worries, sight, and communication.
- Condition severity and family resources (CSES, FNS) predicted 32% of CQOL variance.
- Problems at birth and epilepsy were associated with overall CQOL, while shunt-related factors were not.
Conclusions:
- Hydrocephalus poses a significant threat to a child's quality of life, comparable to spina bifida.
- Beyond condition severity, family resources significantly influence a child's quality of life.
- Targeted support addressing family needs and enhancing caregiving self-efficacy may improve CQOL for children with these conditions.
Abstract:
This study examined the impact of severity and type of condition and family resources on quality of life in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. A national UK sample of children aged between 6 and 13 years with spina bifida (n=62), hydrocephalus (n=354), and spina bifida plus hydrocephalus (n=128) were identified via the register of the Association for Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus (ASBAH). Parents completed standardized measures of Child Health Related Quality Of Life (CQOL), family needs survey (FNS), and caregiving self-efficacy scale (CSES) as well as questions on children's health and physical ability. Results showed there were no significant differences in the overall quality of life for the three disability conditions. The overall CQOL was over 1 SD lower for those with spina bifida and hydrocephalus than for children with other physical conditions. Sex and age were not related to overall CQOL. Specific aspects of CQOL differentiated the three groups. Children with spina bifida had poorer CQOL scores on self-care, continence, and mobility/activities whilst those with hydrocephalus had poorer scores on school activities, worries, sight, and communication. Severity of condition and family resources, i.e. CSES and FNS, predicted 32% of the variance in CQOL. Associations were also found between overall CQOL and problems discernible at birth as well as epilepsy. Other factors, including those related to shunts, were not significantly related to CQOL. It was concluded that hydrocephalus is just as great a threat to CQOL as spina bifida. Beyond the general effect of condition severity on CQOL, family resources (as measured by the CSES and FNS) represent an additional influence on CQOL.
Related Concept Videos
Neurulation
Intellectual Disability
Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology

