Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Review of a pilot quality-assessment program for interpretative comments.

S D Vasikaran1, L Penberthy, J Gill

  • 1Department of Core Clinical Pathology and Biochemistry, Royal Perth Hospital, WA, Australia. samuel.vasikaran@health.wa.gov.au

Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
|June 1, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the Impact of Dedicated Simulation Days on the Confidence of First-Year Diagnostic Radiography Students.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2026
Same author

Maternal immune memory and sex differences in living donor kidney transplant outcomes.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2025
Same author

Reference intervals for plasma β-CTX and P1NP in children: A systematic review and pooled estimates.

Clinical biochemistry·2023
Same author

Impact of allogeneic stem cell transplantation on thyroid function.

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2023
Same author

Disparities in Deceased Donor Kidney Offer Acceptance: A Survey of Canadian Transplant Nephrologists, General Surgeons and Urologists.

Canadian journal of kidney health and disease·2023
Same author

Diffusely abnormal white matter in clinically isolated syndrome is associated with parenchymal loss and elevated neurofilament levels.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2021
Same journal

Routine laboratory triage for NT-proBNP elevation may reflect cardiorenal frailty as much as heart failure specificity.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

From interpretable NT-proBNP prediction to equitable laboratory stewardship.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Serum Sclerostin Levels in Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Population-Specific HOMA-IR Reference Ranges in Iraq: Defining Insulin Sensitivity in a Middle Eastern Cohort.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Laboratory Quality with Sigma Metrics: Application of CLIA 2024 Total Allowable Error Guidelines.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Suspected thermal amplitude of cryoglobulin likely more clinically significant than size detected: A case report.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
See all related articles

The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA)-Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) pilot program for quality assessment of interpretative commenting in chemical pathology was found to be inadequate. Future iterations will include expert panels to assess comment appropriateness for continuing education.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Pathology
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Interpretative commenting is crucial in the post-analytical phase of chemical pathology.
  • Quality assessment of these comments is a recent development.
  • A pilot program by RCPA-AACB began in 2000 to address this.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the pilot phase of the RCPA-AACB Chemical Pathology Patient Report Comments Program.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of quality assessment for interpretative comments.

Main Methods:

  • The program targeted individuals, not laboratories.
  • Monthly circulation of two patient cases with clinical details and biochemistry results over six months.
  • Participant comments were analyzed into key phrases, with frequency histograms generated.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Simple peer-group comparison of comments without assessing appropriateness was insufficient.
  • The initial method lacked a mechanism for evaluating the quality or accuracy of comments.

Conclusions:

  • The program shows potential as a continuing education tool for clinical biochemists and trainees.
  • Enhancements, including expert panel assessment of appropriateness, are needed for program improvement.