Related Experiment Videos
Responding effectively to patient anger directed at the physician
Ronald S McCord1, Michael R Floyd, Forrest Lang
1Department of Family Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City 37614-0621, USA.
Family Medicine
|June 1, 2002
Summary
Patients prefer physicians to apologize and explain long wait times. An apology combined with an explanation was the most satisfactory approach for addressing patient anger during clinic visits.
Area of Science:
- Medical communication
- Patient satisfaction
- Healthcare management
Background:
- Patient anger due to long wait times is frequent in clinical settings.
- Limited research exists on effective strategies for physicians to address patient anger.
- Understanding patient preferences is crucial for improving healthcare interactions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine patient satisfaction, importance ratings, and preferences for various physician responses to patient anger.
- To evaluate different communication strategies for managing patient frustration caused by delays.
Main Methods:
- 130 participants viewed a video of an angry patient and rated 12 physician responses.
- Physician responses were assessed based on apology, explanation, self-disclosure, and acknowledgment.
- Participants also evaluated physician follow-up questions for their effectiveness.
Main Results:
- An apology combined with an explanation received the highest satisfaction and importance ratings.
- "I apologize for your long wait" was preferred over "I am sorry you have been kept waiting."
- Patients favored follow-up questions that smoothly transitioned to the medical interview over those exploring emotions.
Conclusions:
- Patients desire physicians to apologize and explain delays before proceeding with the medical interview.
- A combination of apology and explanation is the most effective strategy for physicians.
- Clear communication and a swift return to the medical agenda are key to patient satisfaction.