Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

Proofreading

Proofreading

Proofreading

Proofreading

Review and Preview

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...

Proofreading

Proofreading

Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore, it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase Enzyme

Review and Preview

Review and Preview

In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

Quality Assurance

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Home
Measuring The Quality Of Editorial Peer Review.

Home
Measuring The Quality Of Editorial Peer Review.

Related Experiment Video

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Measuring the quality of editorial peer review.

Tom Jefferson¹, Elizabeth Wager, Frank Davidoff

¹Health Reviews Ltd, Rome, Italy.

|June 1, 2002

View abstract on PubMed

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Assessing editorial peer review effectiveness is challenging due to undefined objectives. Current outcome measures for peer review quality are limited, hindering improvements in scientific publishing.

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Bibliometrics
Scientific publishing
Research integrity

Background:

Editorial peer review is a cornerstone of scientific publishing, yet its effectiveness is difficult to measure.
Lack of agreed-upon objectives for peer review impedes quality assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify and analyze outcome measures used to evaluate editorial peer review in biomedical journals.
To assess the impact of peer review on the quality of published articles and the review process itself.

Main Methods:

Systematic review of studies examining editorial peer review.
Analysis of outcome measures assessing article quality and reviewer performance.

Main Results:

Ten studies assessed article quality post-peer review; only one compared peer-reviewed to non-peer-reviewed articles.

Eighteen studies evaluated reviewer report quality under various conditions; one compared review process time and cost.

Limited research directly compares peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed outputs.

Conclusions:

Clear objectives for editorial peer review are necessary to accurately assess and enhance its effectiveness.
Methodological challenges and the need for community-wide cooperation hinder research into peer review's broader impacts.