Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attention shifts and memory averaging.

Dirk Kerzel1

  • 1Unit for Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Munich, Germany. kerzel@mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|June 6, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A multilab investigation into the N2pc as an indicator of attentional selectivity: Direct replication of Eimer (1996).

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Guidance of attention by irrelevant contents of working memory is transient.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Electrophysiological evidence for the optimal tuning of attention.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Persistent effects of salience in visual working memory: Limits of cue-driven guidance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Priming of pop-out in the spatial-cueing paradigm.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same author

Do you look longer at attractive faces? It depends on what you are looking for.

i-Perception·2024
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

Visual localization judgments are biased by non-target elements. This study shows that briefly flashed distractors influence localization only when presented near the target

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Visual perception
  • Human psychophysics

Background:

  • Visual localization accuracy can be affected by surrounding elements.
  • Salient non-target elements are often assumed to act as landmarks, attracting perceived target positions.
  • The precise temporal dynamics of distractor influence on visual localization remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of briefly flashed non-target elements on the localization of a moving visual stimulus.
  • To determine the temporal window during which distractors affect localization performance.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms of distractor influence in visual memory.

Main Methods:

  • Participants localized the final position of a moving visual target.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Briefly flashed non-target elements (distractors) were presented at various times relative to the target's disappearance.
  • Localization errors were analyzed to quantify the influence of distractors.

    • Main Results:

    • Localization judgments were significantly biased toward the position of the flashed non-target elements.
    • This distractor attraction effect was observed only when distractors were presented at or shortly after the target's disappearance.
    • Distractors presented earlier or later had no significant influence on localization accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Briefly flashed distractors can influence visual localization, similar to landmark effects.
    • The influence of distractors is temporally constrained, occurring when their memory traces are highly active at target disappearance.
    • This suggests that memory representations of distractors are averaged with the target's position if co-activated during the critical temporal window.