Related Experiment Videos

Concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 testing in the breast intergroup trial N9831

Patrick C Roche1, Vera J Suman, Robert B Jenkins

  • 1Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA.

Insights

Trastuzumab shows promise as adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. However, discrepancies in HER2 testing between local and central labs necessitate revised eligibility criteria for clinical trials.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Molecular Diagnostics

Background:

  • Trastuzumab is effective for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
  • Patients with node-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer have a poor prognosis.
  • Adjuvant trastuzumab is being evaluated to improve outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy in a phase III trial (N9831).
  • To assess HER2 status using central immunohistochemistry (HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
  • To identify discrepancies in local versus central HER2 testing.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, randomized, three-arm, phase III trial (N9831).
  • Inclusion criteria: primary, operable, node-positive, HER2-positive (3+ or gene amplification) breast carcinoma.
  • Central confirmation of HER2 status via HercepTest and Vysis PathVysion FISH assays.

Main Results:

  • Of 119 centrally tested patients, 74% were HercepTest 3+ and 66% had HER2 gene amplification.
  • Only 67% of locally FISH-positive specimens were confirmed centrally.
  • Central HercepTest and FISH concordance was 92%.

Conclusions:

  • Significant discordance (74%) exists between local and central HER2 testing.
  • This variability impacts patient eligibility for adjuvant trastuzumab trials.
  • Trial eligibility criteria were modified due to testing discrepancies.

Related Concept Videos