Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026
A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
Published on: November 6, 2015
Colin M Light1, Paul H Chappell, Peter J Kyberd
1Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, England.
Objective:
To develop a new assessment procedure, the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP), that allows contextual results of hand function to be obtained readily in a clinical environment.
Design:
Reliability (test-retest, interrater) and validity (criterion, content) of new assessment procedure against standard medical outcome measure techniques.
Setting:
Normative data collected in a university laboratory.
Participants:
Twenty-four volunteers selected on the basis of optimum hand function using these criteria: age (range, 18-25 y), and no adverse hand trauma, neurologic condition, or disabling effects of the upper limb.
Interventions:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures:
The normative control group was assessed for variability, and the procedure measured in terms of interrater and test-retest reliability. The absence of a direct comparison prevents a criterion standard from being established; however, content validity was shown by expert peer review.
Results:
The control group data were shown to be multivariate gaussian; test-retest and interrater reliability were demonstrated at the 95% confidence level. The content validity was demonstrated by peer panel approval.
Conclusions:
Results of the control group established the statistical integrity of SHAP. Clinical trials are underway, although more extensive use of the procedure is advocated in primary care and rehabilitation centers where physiotherapy and occupational therapy are actively used in hand rehabilitation.
