Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference.

J B Tenenbaum1, T L Griffiths

  • 1Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA. jbt@psych.stanford.edu

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|June 7, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complex cognitive algorithms preserved by selective social learning in experimental populations.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2022
Same author

See, feel, act: Hierarchical learning for complex manipulation skills with multisensory fusion.

Science robotics·2020
Same author

Rational randomness: the role of sampling in an algorithmic account of preschooler's causal learning.

Advances in child development and behavior·2012
Same author

Secret agents: inferences about hidden causes by 10- and 12-month-old infants.

Psychological science·2005
Same author

Creatine supplementation as an exercise performance enhancer for patients with COPD? An idea to run with.

Thorax·2005
Same author

Inflammatory response and body composition in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2001
Same journal

Shared intentionality and attachment theories in WILD and WEIRD contexts.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Constructing an architecture for a decolonized developmental science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Go WILD, but mind the gap.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILDing the study of developmental trajectories in navigation and wayfinding: Progress and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILD kids, cutting-edge research. Enhancing diversity and reflexivity in psychology.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Ethnographic methods can help psychology overcome its WEIRD problems.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

This study unifies Shepard's generalization theory with a Bayesian framework, extending it to complex scenarios. It also integrates Tversky's set-theoretic model, enhancing generalization explanations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Shepard's universal generalization gradient model.
  • Limitations of the original model: single stimulus, continuous space.
  • Tversky's set-theoretic model as an alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Recast Shepard's theory in a Bayesian framework.
  • Extend generalization to multiple stimuli and arbitrary structures.
  • Unify spatial and set-theoretic models of similarity and generalization.

Main Methods:

  • Bayesian inference and probabilistic modeling.
  • Generalization from multiple consequential stimuli.
  • Integration of set-theoretic concepts within a spatial framework.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Developed a generalized Bayesian framework for Shepard's theory.
  • Extended applicability to realistic generalization scenarios.
  • Demonstrated subsumption and unification of Tversky's model.

Conclusions:

  • The Bayesian framework provides a more general and powerful approach to generalization.
  • Unification advances the explanatory power of set-theoretic models.
  • Bridged the gap between continuous spatial and discrete set-theoretic approaches to similarity.