Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Correlations between major brain regions in Chiroptera.

P Pirlot1, P Jolicoeur

  • 1Département de Sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que., Canada.

Brain, Behavior and Evolution
|January 1, 1982
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of video games on plasticity of the hippocampus.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Notch-1 signaling promotes the cyclinD1-dependent generation of mammary tumor-initiating cells that can revert to bi-potential progenitors from which they arise.

Oncogene·2012
Same author

Sparing from the attentional blink is not spared from structural limitations.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2012
Same author

Unitary attention in callosal agenesis.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2010
Same author

Notch1-induced mammary tumor development is cyclin D1-dependent and correlates with expansion of pre-malignant multipotent duct-limited progenitors.

Oncogene·2010
Same author

New adenovirus vectors for protein production and gene transfer.

Cytotechnology·2008

Brain region size evolution shows complex patterns. Large brain areas lack compensatory effects, while smaller regions exhibit varying correlations, indicating masked evolutionary changes and functional relationships.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Comparative Anatomy

Background:

  • Understanding brain evolution requires analyzing the relative size changes of different brain regions across species.
  • Previous studies suggest compensatory effects in smaller brain nuclei, but large heterogeneous regions present a different evolutionary dynamic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the correlations in evolutionary size changes between different brain regions in mammals.
  • To determine if compensatory effects are evident in large, heterogeneous brain regions compared to smaller, homogeneous ones.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of brain region sizes across diverse mammalian forms.
  • Statistical correlation analysis of progression indices for various brain structures, including the diencephalon, telencephalon, neocortex, striatum, cerebellum, mesencephalon, medulla oblongata, and bulbus olfactorius.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of regional correlations in Chiroptera (bats) and Primates.

    • Main Results:

    • Large, heterogeneous brain regions do not show negative correlations, suggesting masked evolutionary changes rather than compensatory effects.
    • Positive correlations observed between the diencephalon and telencephalon reflect general brain size increase relative to body weight in advanced forms.
    • The neocortex shows strong correlations with the striatum and diencephalon, but weaker correlations with the cerebellum in bats compared to primates.
    • The mesencephalon correlates with the medulla oblongata and cerebellum but not most telencephalic parts.
    • Olfactory bulb correlations with other structures may be driven by differential progression/regression in bat suborders (Megachiroptera and Microchiroptera).

    Conclusions:

    • Evolutionary size changes in large brain regions are complex and may mask underlying functional relationships due to concurrent changes in neighboring areas.
    • Relative brain size increase is a significant factor in evolutionary correlations.
    • Specific regional correlations (e.g., neocortex-striatum) vary across taxa, highlighting the need for comparative approaches.
    • Apparent correlations in olfactory structures might be artifacts of differential evolution in bat groups, not direct functional links.