Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cross signaling, cell specificity, and physiology.

J E Dumont1, S Dremier, I Pirson

  • 1Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Free University of Brussels, Campus Erasme, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. jedumont@ulb.ac.be

American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology
|June 11, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Signal transduction research is confusing due to in vitro artifacts and universal network assumptions. True specificity arises from unique cellular protein sets, structures, and signaling dynamics.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cancer heterogeneity is not compatible with one unique cancer cell metabolic map.

Oncogene·2016
Same author

Revisiting the transcriptional analysis of primary tumours and associated nodal metastases with enhanced biological and statistical controls: application to thyroid cancer.

British journal of cancer·2015
Same author

Systems biology of cancer: entropy, disorder, and selection-driven evolution to independence, invasion and "swarm intelligence".

Cancer metastasis reviews·2013
Same author

A gene expression signature distinguishes normal tissues of sporadic and radiation-induced papillary thyroid carcinomas.

British journal of cancer·2012
Same author

A general method to derive robust organ-specific gene expression-based differentiation indices: application to thyroid cancer diagnostic.

Oncogene·2012
Same author

A novel NDUFV1 gene mutation in complex I deficiency in consanguineous siblings with brainstem lesions and Leigh syndrome.

Clinical genetics·2011

Area of Science:

  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Intracellular signal transduction literature presents a confusing, overly interconnected view of regulatory factors.
  • This contrasts sharply with the known high specificity of extracellular signals in vivo.
  • Existing in vitro studies often lack the specificity observed in biological systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the causes of confusion in intracellular signal transduction literature.
  • To explain the basis of cell-specific signaling specificity in vivo.
  • To reconcile in vitro findings with in vivo biological complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of reductionist artifacts in experimental models.
  • Evaluation of causal inference methods in signal transduction research.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of in vitro models (cell lines, transfections) with in vivo systems.
  • Examination of cell-specific and stage-specific regulatory networks.

    • Main Results:

    • Confusion stems from reductionist artifacts, flawed causal arguments, and inadequate models.
    • The assumption of universal regulatory networks is incorrect; networks are cell and stage specific.
    • Cell specificity arises from unique protein repertoires, spatial organization, combinatorial logic, and signal timing.

    Conclusions:

    • Reconciling in vitro and in vivo data requires acknowledging cell-specific regulatory networks.
    • Understanding signal transduction specificity necessitates considering unique cellular components and dynamics.
    • Future research must account for cell and stage specificity to accurately model biological regulation.