Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Oscillometric blood pressure measurement: progress and problems.

G A van Montfrans1

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. G.vanMontfrans@amc.uva.nl

Blood Pressure Monitoring
|June 11, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biomonitoring arsenic exposure by ancestry: the healthy life in an urban setting (HELIUS) study.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2025
Same author

Creatine Kinase and New-Onset Hypertension: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.

American journal of hypertension·2025
Same author

Exosomes in ultrastructural resistance artery remodeling of human hypertension.

Ultrastructural pathology·2025
Same author

Losartan and Microvascular Reactivity in Women with a History of Preeclampsia.

American journal of hypertension·2025
Same author

Ultrastructural changes in resistance arterioles of normotensive and hypertensive premenopausal women with uterine fibroids.

Ultrastructural pathology·2023
Same author

Structure and function of resistance arteries from BB-creatine kinase and ubiquitous Mt-creatine kinase double knockout mice.

Amino acids·2020
Same journal

Police officers with higher baseline blood pressure have greater cardiovascular reactivity during mental stress.

Blood pressure monitoring·2026
Same journal

Optimizing office blood pressure thresholds to identify controlled ambulatory blood pressure in high-risk pregnancies with chronic hypertension.

Blood pressure monitoring·2026
Same journal

Oscillometric blood pressure measurement using a wide-range cuff from 22 to 41 cm of arm circumference: validation of the Hingmed V03D upper arm blood pressure monitor in a general population.

Blood pressure monitoring·2026
Same journal

Utilizing long-term predialysis blood pressure change to predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a single center retrospective study.

Blood pressure monitoring·2026
Same journal

Asymmetric interarm blood pressure differences on sequential measurements.

Blood pressure monitoring·2026
Same journal

Photoplethysmography based remote cardiac blood pressure monitoring compared with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Blood pressure monitoring·2026
See all related articles

Oscillometric blood pressure monitors require further validation despite meeting standards. New simulators improve reproducibility testing, but algorithm development is crucial for accurate readings.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cardiovascular Technology
  • Medical Device Evaluation

Background:

  • Oscillometric blood pressure measurement is widely adopted.
  • Current devices have passed Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and British Hypertension Society criteria.
  • However, significant deviations in readings occur even in highly-rated devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the current state and limitations of oscillometric blood pressure measurement technology.
  • To evaluate the utility of pressure-wave-simulating devices for validation.
  • To highlight the need for improved algorithms in blood pressure monitoring.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing validation criteria and performance of oscillometric devices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of pressure-wave-simulating devices for reproducibility testing.
  • Analysis of the limitations of the maximal amplitude algorithm.

    • Main Results:

    • Substantial deviations (>5 mmHg) are observed in individual readings, even with devices meeting high standards.
    • Pressure-wave simulators allow for reproducibility testing with proposed intra-device standard deviation limits (<2 mmHg).
    • The maximal amplitude algorithm shows significant drawbacks influenced by pulse pressure, heart rate, and arterial stiffness.

    Conclusions:

    • Complacency regarding oscillometric blood pressure measurement is unwarranted.
    • Pressure-wave simulators are valuable for reproducibility testing but require further refinement for between-device comparisons.
    • Development of robust, widely applicable algorithms beyond the maximal amplitude approach is a high priority.