Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children
Published on: August 22, 2012
Is the exclusion of children under 24 months from anthelmintic treatment justifiable?
Antonio Montresor1, Rebecca J Stoltzfus, Marco Albonico
1Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. montresora@who.int
Insights
Benzimidazole anthelmintics are safe for children under two years old. This study found no adverse effects, supporting reconsidering treatment policies for young children with soil-transmitted helminthiasis.
Area of Science:
- * Pediatric infectious diseases
- * Clinical pharmacology
- * Global health
Background:
- * Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) poses significant risks to children under 24 months.
- * Current policies often exclude this age group from benzimidazole anthelmintic treatment.
- * Limited data exists on the safety of benzimidazole derivatives in infants and toddlers.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of mebendazole in children under 24 months.
- * To assess adverse effects associated with benzimidazole treatment in this vulnerable population.
- * To inform treatment guidelines for STH in young children.
Main Methods:
- * A randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 212 children under 24 months in Tanzania.
- * Participants received either mebendazole (500 mg) or a placebo.
- * Adverse events including fever, cough, diarrhea, and respiratory illness were monitored for one week post-treatment.
Main Results:
- * No significant differences in the occurrence of adverse effects were observed between the mebendazole and placebo groups.
- * Mebendazole was well-tolerated in children under 24 months.
- * The study provides evidence against potential toxicity in this age group.
Conclusions:
- * Benzimidazole anthelmintics, specifically mebendazole, appear safe for treating children under 24 months.
- * The exclusion of children under 24 months from anthelmintic treatment policies should be re-evaluated.
- * Deworming young children may offer significant nutritional and health benefits, warranting broader treatment inclusion.
Abstract:
There are no reports documenting toxicity or adverse effects after treatment of children aged < 24 months with benzimidazole derivatives and there is an urgent need to clarify this point in light of the potential detrimental effect that soil-transmitted helminthiasis has on this age-group. A total of 653 treatments (317 mebendazole 500 mg; 336 placebo) were administered in 1996/97 to 212 children aged < 24 months as part of a 1-year anthelmintic drug study conducted among preschool-age children in Tanzania. Data on fever, cough, diarrhoea, dysentery and acute respiratory illness were collected 1 week following the treatment. No differences between the occurrence of adverse effects in the 2 groups were observed. In light of the potential nutritional benefit achieved by regular deworming in this young age-group, the policy that excludes children aged < 24 months from treatment should be re-considered.
Related Concept Videos
Anthelminthic Agents
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
