New options may improve accuracy of risk adjustment

    Capitation Management Report
    |June 12, 2002
    PubMed

    Related Concept Videos

    Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

    Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

    Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
    Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
    Relative Risk01:12

    Relative Risk

    Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
    Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

    Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

    A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
    The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
    As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
    Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

    Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

    Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
    Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...