Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Transabdominal Ultrasound for Pregnancy Diagnosis in Reeves' Muntjac Deer
Published on: January 7, 2014
Cost-effectiveness of screening for the factor V Leiden mutation in pregnant women
Peter Clark1, Sara Twaddle, Isobel D Walker
1Department of Transfusion Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. peter.clark@snbts.csa.scot.nhs.uk
The factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation is associated with vascular complications in pregnancy, and routine screening of all pregnant women has been suggested. We did a prospective, unselected study in 967 pregnant women to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening all women, or only those with a personal or family history of venous thrombosis (n=113). When anticoagulant prophylaxis was assumed to effect a 50% reduction in vascular complications, we recorded an additional management cost of 3768 pounds sterling with selective screening and 39,841 pounds sterling with universal screening. This additional cost would result in prevention of less than one and three vascular events,respectively. Our findings, therefore, suggest that screening of pregnant women for the FVL mutation is not cost-effective.
The factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation is associated with vascular complications in pregnancy, and routine screening of all pregnant women has been suggested. We did a prospective, unselected study in 967 pregnant women to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening all women, or only those with a personal or family history of venous thrombosis (n=113). When anticoagulant prophylaxis was assumed to effect a 50% reduction in vascular complications, we recorded an additional management cost of 3768 pounds sterling with selective screening and 39,841 pounds sterling with universal screening. This additional cost would result in prevention of less than one and three vascular events,respectively. Our findings, therefore, suggest that screening of pregnant women for the FVL mutation is not cost-effective.
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Relative Risk
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management

