The effect of category learning on sensitivity to within-category correlations
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Seth Chin-Parker1, Brian H Ross
1Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana 61801, USA. chinpark@s.psych.uiuc.edu
Abstract:
A salient property of many categories is that they are not just sets of independent features but consist of clusters of correlated features. Although there is much evidence that people are sensitive to between-categories correlations, the evidence about within-category correlations is mixed. Two experiments tested whether the disparities might be due to different learning and test tasks. Subjects learned about categories either by classifying items or by inferring missing features of items. Their knowledge of the correlations was measured with classification, prediction, typicality, and production tests. The inference learners, but not the classification learners, showed sensitivity to the correlations, although different tests were differentially sensitive. These results reconcile some earlier disparities and provide a more complete understanding of people's sensitivities to within-category correlations.
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Correlations
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Correlation and Causation
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...

