Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Counting on working memory in simple arithmetic when counting is used for problem solving.

Steven A Hecht1

  • 1Division of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie 33314, USA. shecht@fau.edu

Memory & Cognition
|June 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patterns of strengths and weaknesses in children's knowledge about fractions.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2011
Same author

Sources of Group and Individual Differences in Emerging Fraction Skills.

Journal of educational psychology·2010
Same author

Group differences in adult simple arithmetic: good retrievers, not-so-good retrievers, and perfectionists.

Memory & cognition·2006
Same author

Sources of individual differences in fraction skills.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2003
Same author

Emergent literacy skills and training time uniquely predict variability in responses to phonemic awareness training in disadvantaged kindergartners.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2002
Same journal

The properties of personal semantics.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Working memory availability did not influence strategy selection for simple addition problems. However, it impacted strategy execution, particularly when using min counting, suggesting it doesn't explain individual differences in retrieval speed.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Working Memory Research

Background:

  • Understanding the cognitive processes underlying mathematical problem-solving is crucial.
  • Working memory plays a significant role in complex cognitive tasks, including arithmetic.
  • Previous research has explored strategy selection in arithmetic, but the role of working memory resources is less clear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between working memory resource availability and strategy selection/execution in simple addition verification.
  • To determine if working memory limitations affect how individuals choose and perform arithmetic strategies.
  • To explore the contribution of working memory to individual differences in retrieval processes.

Main Methods:

  • A concurrent-task methodology was employed to manipulate working memory load.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants verified simple addition equations (e.g., 4 + 3 = 8).
  • Strategy selection and execution times were recorded under different working memory conditions.
  • Main Results:

    • Undergraduates frequently used non-retrieval strategies, consistent with prior studies.
    • Working memory availability generally did not influence strategy selection.
    • Disrupting central executive and phonological working memory affected strategy execution, specifically with the min counting strategy.

    Conclusions:

    • Working memory resource availability does not appear to be a primary factor in individual differences in strategy selection for simple addition.
    • Working memory limitations can impact the execution of specific arithmetic strategies, like min counting.
    • The findings suggest that working memory does not explain variations in the speed of executing retrieval processes in arithmetic.