Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins.

S A Ferguson1, L L Gaudes-MacLaren, W S Marras

  • 1Biodynamics Laboratory, Institute for Ergonomics, Ohio State University, 1971 Neil Avenue, 210 Baker Systems, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. ferguson.4@osu.edu

Ergonomics
|June 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Job Rotation: Biomechanical Risk, Body Discomfort, and Psychosocial Demands.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Sleep regularity in shiftwork: A missing metric for fatigue risk management?

Sleep medicine reviews·2025
Same author

Assessment of the occupational exposures within homes for home healthcare workers in the United Kingdom.

Human factors in healthcare·2025
Same author

An Ergonomic Comparison of Data Entry Work Using a Keyboard vs. Touch Screen Input Device While Standing and Sitting.

Journal of ergonomics·2025
Same author

How should we manage fatigue in on-call workers? A review of guidance materials and a systematic review of the evidence-base.

Sleep medicine reviews·2024
Same author

Perception versus Reality: The Relationship between Subjective and Objective Measures of Sleep When On-call under Simulated Laboratory Conditions.

Behavioral sleep medicine·2020
Same journal

Fit and dimensional allowance design of firefighting gloves via 3D scanning technology.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Industrial bin design, specifically lifting from the upper front region, significantly reduces spinal loading more than lifting techniques alone. A bin with a handhold may further decrease spinal stress.

Area of Science:

  • Ergonomics and Biomechanics
  • Occupational Health and Safety

Background:

  • Industrial lifting tasks contribute to significant spinal loading and potential injury.
  • Understanding biomechanical factors in lifting is crucial for developing safer work practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of lifting styles and industrial bin design on three-dimensional spinal loading.
  • To identify optimal bin configurations and lifting strategies for minimizing spinal forces.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an EMG-assisted biomechanical model to estimate spinal compression and shear forces.
  • Examined two lifting styles (one-hand vs. two-hand, one-foot vs. two-feet) and bin design factors (load region, bin height).
  • Evaluated one-handed lifting with and without body support in Phase II.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Bin design, particularly the load region, had the greatest effect on spinal loading.
  • Lifting from the upper front region minimized spinal loading across all styles.
  • Supported one-handed lifting techniques resulted in lower compressive and shear loads compared to two-handed lifting.

Conclusions:

  • Optimizing industrial bin design for lifting from the upper front region is more effective in reducing spinal loading than modifying lifting styles alone.
  • Incorporating features like handholds can promote supported lifting techniques, further reducing spinal loading.