Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

A Highly Scalable Approach to Perform Ecological Surveys of Selfing Caenorhabditis Nematodes
Published on: March 1, 2022
Genetic distances and ordination: the land snail Helix aspersa in north Africa as a test case
A Guiller1, A Bellido, L Madec
1Laboratoire de Parasitologie Pharmaceutique (CNRS UMR 6553), Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, 35043 Rennes, France. annie.guiller@univ-rennes1.fr
Abstract:
We examined the efficiencies of ordination methods in the treatment of gene frequency data at intraspecific level, using metric and nonmetric distance measures (Nei's and Rogers' genetic distances, chi 2 distance). We assessed initial processes responsible for the geographical distribution of the Mediterranean land snail Helix aspersa. Seventeen enzyme loci from 30 North African snail populations were considered in the present analysis. Five combinations of distance/multivariate analysis were compared: correspondence analysis (CA), nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) on Nei's, Rogers', and chi 2 distances, and principal coordinates analysis on Rogers' distances. Configuration of the objects resulting from ordination was projected onto three-dimensional graphics with the minimum spanning tree or the relative neighborhood graph superimposed. Pre- and postordination or clustering distance matrices were compared by means of correlation methods. As expected, all combinations led to a clear west versus east pattern of variation. However, the intraregional relationships and degree of connectivity between pairs of operational taxonomic units were not necessarily constant from one method to another. Ordination methods when applied with Nei's and Rogers' distances provided the best fit, with original distances (r = 0.98) compared with UPGMA clustering (r approximately 0.75). The Nei/NMDS combination seems to be a good compromise (distortion index dt = 10%) between Rogers/NMDS, which produces a more confusing pattern of differentiation (dt = 24%), and chi 2/CA, which tends to distort large distances (dt = 31%). NMDS obviously provides a powerful method to summarize relationships between populations, when neither hierarchical structure nor phylogenetic inference are required. These findings led the discussion on the good performance of NMDS, the appropriate distances to be used, and the potential application of this method to other types of allelic data (such as microsatellite loci) or data on nucleotide sequences of genes.
Related Concept Videos
Dihybrid Crosses
Genetics of Speciation
Gene Flow
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Modern Molecular Taxonomy

