Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multilevel likelihood ratios for identifying exudative pleural effusions(*).

John E Heffner1, Steven A Sahn, Lee K Brown

  • 1Medical University of South Carolina (Drs. Heffner and Sahn), Charleston, SC.

Chest
|June 18, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Idiopathic central sleep apnea: the past, the present, and the future.

Sleep·2025
Same author

Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy for Central Sleep Apnea in Patients with Heart Failure: A Multisite, Double-Blind, Sham-controlled Randomized Clinical Trial (LOFT-HF).

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2025
Same author

Outcomes Following Metoidioplasty and Phalloplasty Gender Affirming Surgery With Urethral Lengthening: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study.

Urology·2025
Same author

Catecholamine exposure and the gut microbiota in obstructive sleep apnea.

PeerJ·2025
Same author

Metoidioplasty and Phalloplasty Gender-Affirming Surgery and Association with Gender Congruence and Life Satisfaction: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Transgender health·2025
Same author

Personalized Data-Driven State Models of the Circadian Dynamics in a Biometric Signal.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same journal

A Comparative Study of Radiation Exposure in Conventional and Robotic Bronchoscopy.

Chest·2026
Same journal

Independent Prognostic Contributions of Anti-Ro52 and Anti-MDA5 in Autoimmune-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.

Chest·2026
Same journal

Lung aeration and gas exchange in SGA or AGA infants with moderate-severe BPD: secondary analysis of the PATH-BPD study.

Chest·2026
Same journal

Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality after Negative Low-Dose CT Screening Results.

Chest·2026
Same journal

Symptom prevalence and impact on lung cancer risk in the SUMMIT study.

Chest·2026
Same journal

How I Do It: De-escalation of Prostacyclin-Based Therapy in Patients Treated With Sotatercept.

Chest·2026
See all related articles

This study determined multilevel likelihood ratios for pleural fluid tests to differentiate between exudative and transudative effusions. These ratios enhance diagnostic accuracy when combined with clinical judgment.

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonary Medicine
  • Diagnostic Accuracy
  • Biomarkers

Background:

  • Distinguishing between exudative and transudative pleural effusions is crucial for patient management.
  • Current diagnostic methods using single cutoff points can be ambiguous, leading to terms like 'pseudoexudates.'

Purpose of the Study:

  • To calculate multilevel likelihood ratios for common pleural fluid tests.
  • To assess the utility of these ratios in differentiating pleural effusion types.

Main Methods:

  • A meta-analysis of patient-level data from 1,448 individuals was performed.
  • Likelihood ratios were calculated for various pleural fluid analytes, including components of Light's criteria.

Main Results:

  • Multilevel likelihood ratios were determined for pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), protein, cholesterol, and albumin gradients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • These ratios provided clinically relevant diagnostic information across a range of test values (0 to 10).
  • Conclusions:

    • Multilevel likelihood ratios improve the diagnostic accuracy of pleural effusion classification.
    • Using likelihood ratios enhances clinical decision-making by providing a more nuanced interpretation of test results.