Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis.

D L Swiderski1, M L Zelditch, W L Fink

  • 1Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. dlswider@umich.edu

Systematic Biology
|June 18, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

BDNF gene therapy induces auditory nerve survival and fiber sprouting in deaf Pou4f3 mutant mice.

Scientific reports·2012
Same author

Spatiotemporal reorganization of growth rates in the evolution of ontogeny.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2000
Same author

Phenotypic plasticity in skull and dental morphology in the prairie deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii).

Journal of morphology·1996
Same author

Expression of interleukin-6 in association with rat lung reimplantation and allograft rejection.

The American review of respiratory disease·1993
Same author

The bimodal expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in association with rat lung reimplantation and allograft rejection.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·1993
Same author

Microcomputers and phylogenetic analysis.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1986
Same journal

Diversification dynamics in the global radiation of gobies.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: nQMaker: Estimating Time Nonreversible Amino Acid Substitution Models.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic challenges in polyploid-rich lineages: Insights from paralog processing and reticulation methods using the complex genus Packera (Asteraceae: Senecioneae).

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

An evolving view of phylogenetic biogeography.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Modeling Site-and-Branch-Heterogeneity with GFmix.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Coalescent-based branch length estimation improves dating of species trees.

Systematic biology·2026
See all related articles

Coding methods in phylogenetic systematics should focus on identifying shared evolutionary novelties, not just statistical similarity. This approach ensures accurate hypothesis testing for homology and evolutionary relationships.

Area of Science:

  • Systematic Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • The selection of coding methods in phylogenetic systematics is crucial for accurately identifying homologous character states and evolutionary novelties.
  • Traditional approaches often rely on statistical summaries of variation, which can obscure the recognition of shared novelties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a coding method for phylogenetic systematics that prioritizes the identification of evolutionary novelties over statistical similarity.
  • To address the challenges posed by overlapping variation ranges in taxa during the coding process.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing graphical displays of individual character values for coding decisions.
  • Evaluating coding based on all individuals within a taxon, rather than statistical distributions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Independently assessing evidence for divergence between overlapping taxa.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated limitations of statistical methods in recognizing evolutionary novelty and inferring homology.
    • Highlighted that statistical similarity (proximity in morphospace) is not equivalent to the shared novelty required for phylogenetic analysis.
    • Advocated for a coding approach that mirrors qualitative methods in its focus on evolutionary novelty.

    Conclusions:

    • Coding decisions in phylogenetic systematics must be grounded in the principles of recognizing shared evolutionary novelties.
    • Graphical displays of individual data provide a robust method for coding, avoiding a priori rules unrelated to evolutionary novelty.
    • This approach ensures that coding directly supports the hypothesis testing central to phylogenetic systematics.