Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

Laser-Induced Action Potential-Like Measurements of Cardiomyocytes on Microelectrode Arrays for Increased Predictivity of Safety Pharmacology
Published on: September 13, 2022
Population pharmacokinetics, protein binding and antiarrhythmic effects of disopyramide enantiomers in arrhythmic
1Clinical Pharmacology Center, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan. aso@nms.ac.jp
Abstract:
Disopyramide (DP) is widely used as an antiarrhythmic agent. The antiarrhythmic effects of its enantiomers differ from each other and its metabolism and protein binding are also stereoselective. Population pharmacokinetic parameters of DP racemate, enantiomers (S(+)-DP, R(-)-DP), and their unbound concentrations (uDP, S(+)-uDP and R(-)-uDP) were analyzed using the nonlinear mixed effect model (NONMEM) program. Data were available from 108 points of 33 arrhythmic patients on maintenance therapy with DP racemate. We evaluated the factors to which pharmacokinetic parameters are attributed and the relationships between each serum concentration and the antiarrhythmic effect. A one-compartment model was fitted to the data using NONMEM. For DP, S(+)-DP and R(-)-DP, elimination rate constants (kes) were estimated as 0.0648, 0.0663 and 0.0691/h, respectively and the mean apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F) were estimated as 63.2, 54.1 and 71.6 l, respectively. Using the ke and Vd/F values estimated by NONMEM, time-concentration curves were well fitted to the observed data. Unbound fractions of both DP enantiomers showed nonlinearity and the binding ratio of S(+)-DP was 0.84 +/- 0.07, which was higher than that of R(-)-DP [0.70 +/- 0.11 (p < 0.01)]. Unbound fractions of both DP enantiomers correlated with alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) (p < 0.01). On the other hand, using NONMEM, a significant proportion of the variability of Vd/F could be attributed only to AGP (p < 0.001). NONMEM was able to clarify the pharmacokinetic features in the protein binding of DP. Individual steady state concentrations were estimated by NONMEM using the Bayesian method. The average unbound concentrations of all nine responders were higher than those of the four non-responders, even though this difference was not significant. Unbound concentrations may reflect drug concentrations in the tissue, which suggests that these concentrations may indicate an antiarrhythmic effect rather than the total concentration.
More Related Videos
10:05Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
08:28Methods for ECG Evaluation of Indicators of Cardiac Risk, and Susceptibility to Aconitine-induced Arrhythmias in Rats Following Status Epilepticus
Published on: April 5, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics