Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

High-Efficiency Transduction of Liver Cancer Cells by Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype 3 Vectors
Published on: March 22, 2011
Adeno-associated viral vectors penetrate human solid tumor tissue in vivo more effectively than adenoviral vectors
Per Øyvind Enger1, Frits Thorsen, Per Eystein Lønning
1Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Abstract:
The transduction efficiencies of adeno-associated viral vectors (AAV, serotype 2) and adenovirus vectors (ADV, serotype 5) were examined in three different models of cancer. First, we used flow cytometry to quantitate AAV-GFP or ADV-GFP transduction in 13 cell lines derived from malignant tissue (6 gliomas, 6 mammary cancers, and 1 leukemia). These experiments showed variable transduction efficiency (0%-81%) between the cell lines, with ADV being more effective compared to AAV in 9 of 13 cell lines. Second, spheroids prepared from human glioblastomas were infected with ADV or AAV expressing GFP or lacZ cassettes, and after 2 weeks, uniform reporter gene expression was observed on the spheroid. Whereas AAV produced consistent transduction throughout the spheroids, ADV infection was mainly limited to the outer cell layers of the spheroids, suggesting that AAV were more efficient at penetrating solid tumor tissue. Third, human biopsies from glioblastoma multiforme patients were xenografted into nude rats and grown for 4 weeks followed by viral vector injection. Combined use of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histologic analysis allowed the identification of transduced cells and their spatial distribution within the tumors. AAV-mediated transgene expression was observed in cell clusters through the entire tumor, while ADV-mediated transduction was restricted to cells at the tumor periphery. Thus, while AAV and ADV vectors may infect tumor-derived cell lines to a similar degree, AAV penetrated glioblastoma spheroids and xenografts more efficiently compared to ADV vectors. These results suggest that AAV may be suitable for therapeutic gene delivery to malignant tumors.
Insights
Adeno-associated viral vectors (AAV) showed superior tumor penetration compared to adenovirus vectors (ADV) in preclinical cancer models. AAV demonstrated better transduction efficiency in glioblastoma spheroids and xenografts, suggesting potential for gene therapy.
Area of Science:
- Gene Therapy
- Oncology
- Virology
Background:
- Viral vectors are crucial for gene delivery in cancer research.
- Adeno-associated virus (AAV) and adenovirus (ADV) are commonly used vectors.
- Understanding their transduction efficiency in tumors is vital for therapeutic development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the transduction efficiencies of AAV serotype 2 and ADV serotype 5 in cancer models.
- To evaluate vector penetration and gene expression in cell lines, spheroids, and xenografts.
Main Methods:
- Flow cytometry analysis of AAV-GFP and ADV-GFP transduction in 13 cancer cell lines.
- Infection of glioblastoma spheroids with AAV and ADV vectors expressing reporter genes.
- Xenograft models of human glioblastoma in nude rats, analyzed by MRI and histology post-vector injection.
Main Results:
- Variable transduction efficiencies (0%-81%) observed in cell lines; ADV was more effective in 9/13 lines.
- AAV showed consistent transduction throughout glioblastoma spheroids, while ADV was limited to the periphery.
- AAV achieved whole-tumor transduction in xenografts, whereas ADV transduction was restricted to the tumor edge.
Conclusions:
- AAV vectors demonstrate superior penetration and transduction efficiency in glioblastoma spheroids and xenografts compared to ADV vectors.
- AAV vectors show promise for effective therapeutic gene delivery to solid malignant tumors.
- Vector choice significantly impacts gene expression distribution within tumor models.

